From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31C0C21F756 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 01:13:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1444119218; bh=FyDX8qcPuAdpjt1zSX7WeiZEuQFagY+526RnhIpaZcc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TKgdVXz8uy+/aWoxflTr/bFHxSZaCz4hT/vClrMSYd6DvhKm576HhZHU/cggIISqX sSDsiXmjCk082dI3bEdklNmrZDFCsv1DByuohy1bJ8Bbf0Cb5engRyoTUZGIeBcsYm zHkR/548doCh63aIVt7oWTe+GWtwvQTImd28Ddxg= Sender: toke@toke.dk Received: by alrua-kau.kau.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 27E7FC4010E; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:13:38 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Sebastian Moeller References: <0EB23696-5866-48C5-AC7E-B8570C7AA900@gmx.de> <561369A9.2090607@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <0F1BBA35-381C-4405-967A-3E266CFCC6F1@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:13:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0F1BBA35-381C-4405-967A-3E266CFCC6F1@gmx.de> (Sebastian Moeller's message of "Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:18:22 +0200") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87k2r02z4d.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] flow_hash vs host_hash X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:14:04 -0000 Sebastian Moeller writes: > I believe you nailed it, but the pony will still work on egress, Don't packets hit the qdisc after NAT has been applied? -Toke