From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=none; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=fail (Used From Domain Record) header.from=toke.dk policy.dmarc=none From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Jamal Hadi Salim , =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Victor Nogueira , Sashiko In-Reply-To: References: <87ld7t3kl3.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 20:39:11 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87ld7twn5c.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MailFrom: toke@toke.dk X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: implicit-dest X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header Message-ID-Hash: RUGHGQ75JZTWYXSU45GK7WENNWMNGRKH X-Message-ID-Hash: RUGHGQ75JZTWYXSU45GK7WENNWMNGRKH X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 20:43:14 +0200 X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Subject: [Cake] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net/sched/sch_cake: serialize reconfiguration with the datapath List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Jamal Hadi Salim writes: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 10:53=E2=80=AFAM Bj=C3=B6rn T=C3=B6pel wrote: >> >> Jamal! >> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 at 15:47, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >> > >> > Hey Bj=C3=B6rn, >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 9:07=E2=80=AFAM Bj=C3=B6rn T=C3=B6pel wrote: >> > > >> > > Jamal Hadi Salim writes: >> > > >> > > > This is a follow-up to commit 7cbfb180945c ("net/sched: sch_cake: = fix >> > > > autorate reconfiguration throttling"). That change only stored >> > > > last_reconfig_time; it did not address the concurrency between the >> > > > autorate rate update in cake_enqueue() and the netlink reconfigura= tion >> > > > path, which the original review flagged. >> > > > >> > >> > You are reviewing a very old version - the last one was a v6[1], most >> > of these fixes are in the "no good deed goes unpunished" from sashiko >> > ;-> >> > I am about to post a v7. Maybe review that one? >> >> OMG... sorry for the noise. >> > > Not noise at all - with all these AI dump it is overwhelming. Always > great to have someone review. Sashiko will always find something to > whine about - the bikeshedding it engages in is shameless sometimes;-> > I just sent an update. Erm, I think you're confusing patch series? This one is not the one you're at v7 on, Bj=C3=B6rn did review the latest version AFAICT (and I agr= ee with his comments FWIW) :) -Toke