From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [45.145.95.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463B13B2A4 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:26:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1595593563; bh=hcMkdRHpG5eiJo5rzuwhu533OSGwU1GYfl6ULEf2E/8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=yz6ctLmnRbaihb40BMGCiiz1r2GZNUyFEFRizOCbKNAd00YNSwIsRVeraCCv6ZjgT rpK0R8PHW5xRTPmodaxn3r4l4qifgEZKTJmyWAlyVBAOvzHE/PULRZOOLiLZ9+RDq6 L4NTGOziedpX1OrteYtPh1ziJBObiv5J3u+bQFE/TKaFNohMahRw7HPItnvXVIgCsQ 9Js+n8wYlK2tTtlxOR5oR7bxQLm+TA5G1lsl6DYzGbofEfCLnSERJZVnDXH0Jc1HSX 1IQtJFbf+hHRZj/tv0f4d7widhLSLnJxzNjPEj0CqB8t+8b7CMZu0VXh/0dSVvPCLP g29gpBXkgWNRA== To: Luca Muscariello , Cake List In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:26:01 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87lfj95cbq.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Cake] quantum configuration X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:26:04 -0000 Luca Muscariello writes: > Is there a reason why in cake the quantum cannot be configured to a > different value like in fq_codel? I think this was mostly to be as no-knob as possible; so the quantum is auto-scaled with the tin bandwidths, instead of being configurable. Jonathan can probably expand on this... -Toke