From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8DCC3B2A4 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:19:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from nemesis.taht.net (c-24-6-113-161.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.113.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A703A21474; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:19:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Pete Heist Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <87vaic8vv1.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> <87bmk372du.fsf_-_@nemesis.taht.net> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:19:43 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Pete Heist's message of "Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:06:53 +0100") Message-ID: <87lgj75m74.fsf@nemesis.taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake upstream Planning X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:19:46 -0000 Pete Heist writes: > On Nov 15, 2017, at 8:44 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >=20=20=20=20=20 >=20=20=20=20=20 > I dearly would like to try and submit cake to mainline linux in > december. Getting it done is going to take group effort. >=20=20=20=20=20 > And trying to cover all the corner cases, is going to take co-ordinat= ion > and scripting, and perhaps we should switch to google docs to pull to= gether. >=20=20=20=20=20 > Also, it might be fun to schedule a dramatic reading of the source co= de > via videoconference because theres a lot in cake that not enough peop= le > (except maybe jonathan) understand. >=20=20=20=20=20 > > That sounds good. Rather than my making some test plan, if you start a do= c just > plug me in where you think it=E2=80=99s best. I'll try to review what's been discussed so far and get a document out by sunday. BTW, all, I have reserved time on the "vuc" conference december 15th to discuss where we are in the bufferbloat project. That's more of a "meet the press" kind of thing than the internal discussion here. > > There=E2=80=99s also been a Cake support feature request hanging around i= n the EdgeOS > forums for a while after Lochnair=E2=80=99s successful work to get it bui= lt for the > EdgeRouter firmware: > > https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/Cake-shaper-suppor= t/idi-p/1885749 I had viewed those folk as a key path to commercialization. They have a great user community and great products. > Maybe this would help get it pushed through into a device that I think has > pretty wide deployment=E2=80=A6 The problem is, they were stuck on kernel 3.10, when last I looked and oy... I keep hoping we can get cavium to pay attention directly.