From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD8FB3CB3D
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 06:02:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1521799322; bh=d16Lp5MvlmZnVTwC1BvR3pV/0hIGAQ/hqflmtShJXyA=;
 h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=TldId7Ljgimx8pJ+N41S40vMBFsHBvjDXokIXEVsE9ZU+rOgwxN7bAwM9qakIf610
 18I/BtbQpTTWS/ve9p0ifFXDvis6+yaMrKzIpi2X9NtWiMsOb6l6qDYZq3b5uKdZWS
 t61s+OVYIH1s4pSyQA2LpZmU5MKEtLgUZp0jMNkaPESsKjc5Y5CNJC08Ak19oVrX9Y
 bh0A9lmS0+qnpH+aI6Lk+FPKALH+SmTx+XSVoTJn2+IFEVd9zv2jmNTurqiVmZRVQT
 OHHi4LuPhaRnSTxDgnl2dYsXUkh0KOVyLn1TQl63HW6VcYdb1q2V+lZCxFPR6wPZ1g
 TiCWam7tOrTzQ==
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7q96gY1W7Sb1V3u0KuUwPMQ=gSzDLg4YgvRd+fPmtAHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw7q96gY1W7Sb1V3u0KuUwPMQ=gSzDLg4YgvRd+fPmtAHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:58:59 +0000
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87muyz2jvg.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Cake] eliminating link_ms and increasing packets to 64 bits
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:02:04 -0000

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:

>  	fprintf(f, "  pkts    ");
>  	FOR_EACH_TIN(stnc, tst, i)
> -		fprintf(f, " %12u", tst->sent.packets);
> +		fprintf(f, " %12llu", tst->sent.packets);
>  	fprintf(f, "\n");

Presumably this can potentially break column alignment? Not sure that is
too much of a problem, though; mostly cosmetic?

-Toke