From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Cake] Announce - possible new feature - DSCP cleaning
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:57:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oaera5a8.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564C5E56.3060700@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> (Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:17:42 +0000")
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> writes:
> The jury hasn't even been assembled, let alone sat as to whether these
> (potentially) increasing targets/intervals on 'slow' links is a good
> thing(tm) or not.
I think I was leaning towards 'no' last time around on this.
>> memory used: 612600b of 15140Kb # not huge on parsing this
>> capacity estimate: 724522Kbit # not huge on parsing this
>
> That's a function of the sprint_size(), sprint_time(), sprint_rate()
> (and matching get_*() ) helpers provided by tc. Similar 'playing with'
> units can be seen in the threshold values for each tin. A 'classic'
> example demonstrating both A) and unit playing:
I think we should prioritise human readability in tc output. If we want
to have a mode that is easy to parse, make it a separate one (was
looking for a 'machine-readable' switch to tc, but there doesn't seem to
be one).
Would it be viable to get a patch into iproute that makes it sprout csv
or json, do you think?
Besides, as far as being a pain to parse, the 'tin table' is way worse,
as far as I'm concerned.
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-18 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-17 19:05 Dave Taht
2015-11-18 11:17 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-18 11:57 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2015-11-18 18:56 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-10 15:00 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 14:59 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 15:03 ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 15:20 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 15:57 ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 16:25 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 17:47 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 17:59 ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 18:11 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 18:25 ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 18:32 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-11-16 18:35 ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 18:43 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 18:47 ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 20:09 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-17 10:12 ` Dave Taht
2015-11-17 18:52 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 15:33 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87oaera5a8.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox