Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Cake] Announce - possible new feature - DSCP cleaning
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:57:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oaera5a8.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564C5E56.3060700@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> (Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:17:42 +0000")

Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> writes:

> The jury hasn't even been assembled, let alone sat as to whether these
> (potentially) increasing targets/intervals on 'slow' links is a good
> thing(tm) or not.

I think I was leaning towards 'no' last time around on this.

>> memory used: 612600b of 15140Kb # not huge on parsing this
>> capacity estimate: 724522Kbit # not huge on parsing this
>
> That's a function of the sprint_size(), sprint_time(), sprint_rate()
> (and matching get_*() ) helpers provided by tc.  Similar 'playing with'
> units can be seen in the threshold values for each tin.  A 'classic'
> example demonstrating both A) and unit playing:

I think we should prioritise human readability in tc output. If we want
to have a mode that is easy to parse, make it a separate one (was
looking for a 'machine-readable' switch to tc, but there doesn't seem to
be one).

Would it be viable to get a patch into iproute that makes it sprout csv
or json, do you think?

Besides, as far as being a pain to parse, the 'tin table' is way worse,
as far as I'm concerned.

-Toke

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-18 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-17 19:05 Dave Taht
2015-11-18 11:17 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-18 11:57   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2015-11-18 18:56     ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-10 15:00 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 14:59 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 15:03   ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 15:20     ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 15:57       ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 16:25         ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 17:47         ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 17:59           ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 18:11             ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 18:25               ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 18:32                 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-11-16 18:35                   ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 18:43                     ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 18:47                       ` Dave Taht
2015-11-16 20:09                         ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-17 10:12                           ` Dave Taht
2015-11-17 18:52                             ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-11-16 15:33     ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87oaera5a8.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@toke.dk \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox