From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave@taht.net>
Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net
 [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:7028])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842A13BA8E
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:07:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nemesis.taht.net (unknown
 [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:2e0:4cff:fec1:1206])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58B31220ED;
 Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:07:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Cc: "cake\@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
References: <8760a3thr8.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
 <7FAC50AA-5AEB-475E-B796-2933D3F48BD7@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:07:28 -0800
In-Reply-To: <7FAC50AA-5AEB-475E-B796-2933D3F48BD7@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
 (Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant's message of "Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:14:50
 +0000")
Message-ID: <87po88x6sv.fsf@nemesis.taht.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Cake] cobalt through checkpatch
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:07:31 -0000

Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> writes:

>> On 21 Nov 2017, at 21:59, Dave Taht <dave@taht.net> wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>> You will want to pull and rebase on top of this.
>>=20
>> Are there any other patches still lying out of tree worth considering?
>
> Just did a PR for turning max_skblen (or whatever it is) to a u32=E2=80=
=A6.since there *are* super packets out there >64KB.

There are?

> Opinions on doing a PR for LEDE so they can enjoy(/crash) the fruits of o=
ur latest cobalt.  They=E2=80=99re currently missing ingress mode & ack fil=
tering filtering toys.

Nah. Let's get it into net-next first this time. I would hope for some
good comments.

Also, I *think* that that version will build on 4.9 without any backward
compatability cruft except for patching pkt_sched.h. Is lede fully 4.9 now?

>
> KDB
>
>
>>=20
>> * retired cobalt.c
>> * made checkpatch considerably less unhappy
>>  (down to zero warnings and checks)
>> * I added a few comments as well.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cake mailing list
>> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake