From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A228C21F86C for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:14:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1446113650; bh=QiaRfS4P+bPQmh0ftVXpmhHDX2Tdyo3Xp01rFY7SMXs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=PCYr1elccz2PpF4T5c5cL3FAoue7biw8cazikCp/zbZIP2UHri9jA6vSq1R/vo4/Y B8Rt8Q9X3h392uNPQD4Vwhi4apY/YBqRMFyRa0W0bShH5T1mQ7yTRVgeIMK2xNxoaL 8KtaWNiSO02FIe2NWo3mbHUpldQySmO6etHvl/jE= Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0EBC49D80; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:14:09 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Sebastian Moeller References: <87twpaf0tq.fsf@toke.dk> <4B2F9D53-393D-44EC-8DC2-A59DFE0E6CBD@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:14:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4B2F9D53-393D-44EC-8DC2-A59DFE0E6CBD@gmx.de> (Sebastian Moeller's message of "Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:11:22 +0100") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87pozyf0cu.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] memory X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:14:36 -0000 Sebastian Moeller writes: > Fair enough ;) Let=E2=80=99s get the soldering iron out and see whether I= can > replace the phi with a 10Mbit one ;), mmmh, maybe I should run 10BASE5 > and do away with all that modernist =E2=80=9Chub=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Csw= itch=E2=80=9D witch craft > while I am at it Joking aside, I believe the issue only occurred on > loooong RTTs so it will only be a minor issue in real life, but still > it would be nice if cake would not introduce the possibility for > remote parties to make my router OOM/reboot ;). I might be odd, but I > prefer a hit in throughput to a forced reboot any day ;) The "1 second RTT" part was a key part in that... If the RTT is set to 100ms (the default), you'll only get a limit of 12.5 MB... Now, there is still an issue to be resolved in "unlimited" mode. But that's a separate issue. -Toke