From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF173B2A4 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2019 08:10:44 -0500 (EST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1546693843; bh=hajAXz01fspG4jafRbh4URmaIJDQ9wUhR21X/1RE1vU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=luz3OAWlcM9l/gm9XSDPlrLM7OwXNiCQl5Ev1gJKWq6j7wsGWad23qh02OX96qY38 aXfbJ/QDdOJCC5FomSoGwQ2E8y7y6cXfX2neLd8cvm8J0sYTWutIabYl5pHb/U4/SZ dlEIKoYBTZ/5oGFw9vPWQk80lbfaa58gYQZrd5rtQjJnw1dnnf29MzIOVmfMz2k+4l s5d2cXMwOwZNq1hvyXJhyg9aSMHXJrTgqfW6+1tyOwOaQGgU+dUkvBSlfl/Y+cugkk UzrZFuM5+0XZKCBbAdkdH2tFKRZ3Cmwf32PB8f7NhTSq6XG0JFPm7O22aMlDB+3Y9G 5NCoah3N9kfMg== To: Pete Heist Cc: Cake List In-Reply-To: References: <5482A3CA-9C36-4DDE-A858-24D8467F70C7@heistp.net> <8736q8yumt.fsf@toke.dk> <4C422792-7E51-4DBA-A229-FA7D3F987FB6@heistp.net> <87zhsgxdao.fsf@toke.dk> <87wonjxvss.fsf@toke.dk> <0077CC34-490F-4D76-82D3-BE37B27F2E1C@heistp.net> <49A6DCF8-BE98-47F4-9C66-6B4288390A58@heistp.net> <87tvinxos7.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 14:10:42 +0100 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87r2drxnal.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] cake infinite loop(?) with hfsc on one-armed router X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 13:10:44 -0000 Pete Heist writes: > Ok, that fixes the compiler warnings, but I get this now. Same as > before it=E2=80=99s repeated until reboot, stack sometimes changes but I > always see sch_hfsc.c:1427 at the beginning: Hmm, that's odd. Could you try adding this debugging line in adjust_parent_qlen(), right before the sch->q.qlen +=3D n line: net_info_ratelimited("Adjusting parent qdisc %d with pkt +=3D %d, len += =3D %d", parentid, n, len); And see if you actually get any of those lines in your dmesg? -Toke