From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02DA21F8F9 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 05:30:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1446208233; bh=59frYgbUa1b9tytEJek7qalEwEiIzHRmNb0OFx4rFM0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=RjFOQHHOLHKnQdN5Q5K48Ny0/hNkJrb00FbqEqQ6fkOz23G9/VxJcJudg4tSpOxCC 3RQ7Px6QkpJMvFYJ8eBEvQNmQS0X0hYxdo4sewAYSQSomudaLWr1ywoLZcRNJf/81J wL98iq0tPLQTmvI4BJtjpH6DuNze+LugQHqDiZe0= Sender: toke@toke.dk Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4AB0C49E99; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:30:17 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Dave Taht References: Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:30:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht's message of "Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:26:02 -0400") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87r3kcedye.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [Cake] kernel performance analysis in openwrt X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:30:59 -0000 Dave Taht writes: > So we are having issues with long term forwarding throughput in cake? > or just cake on low end processors? Am confused. ? No issues on x86 that I've noticed. The slowdown is on the Archer. -Toke