From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2a0c:4d80:42:2001::664]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DC283B2A4 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:39:47 -0500 (EST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1708706385; bh=H/962ZOWn/EHiuvxRjDnNQMspY6xgO9jNmIpSsrnghA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=XIIvt9KcZ61yAVWmjeKSjVAANJ/1+lrbiCQqWSngDY6dDlDd2s534GiEffUkbLTr4 j/uF5mTsAS91G5DRT9+A+5wiIWXUHwoD5CC+fd3mh/vUNJukDAbKVShKgSv5pWRL0r qHCpI+CYhIsLk558mehNqXFi0I6EiDfsA9hppQjlpnoW9y+4B6my0o7H3E6oZ31CCj hhifSqLgPfs5+QjooxCvD6m/h8nyysMp/Jeei/UA8gLFgnfJ7KHYZ3LEsLA7clceOd PjQicE/ZQiT1dZGcBX3NKMYjPy/d45krJO79NUv8pNA9bHeR7fFKoZczwuX4ojl6s/ B0EoRD/v0GVGA== To: Dave Taht Cc: Cake List In-Reply-To: References: <875xyldhbk.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:39:44 +0100 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87sf1juobz.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] cake's ack-filter vs GSO X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:39:47 -0000 Dave Taht writes: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 8:37=E2=80=AFAM Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen = wrote: >> >> Dave Taht via Cake writes: >> >> > It has been years since I looked at cake's code. >> > >> > Does anyone remember why we do not ack-filter a gso-split? >> >> Because a GSO packet cannot be a pure ACK, so it wouldn't be filtered >> anyway... > > But a GRO packet can, and most likely IS a pure ack packet train that > could and should be thinned. I think. Yes? Erm, no, because those would have header differences and so wouldn't be combined into a single GRO packet... -Toke