From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:7028]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 235A43B2A4 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:43:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dancer.taht.net (c-73-162-29-198.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.162.29.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0B2E21425; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 23:43:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Jonathan Morton Cc: Sebastian Gottschall , "cake\@lists.bufferbloat.net \>\> Cake List" References: <384866b4-4c91-cf2c-c267-ee4036e5fbf7@newmedia-net.de> <87wof7sriw.fsf@toke.dk> <6782ec15-30eb-63b0-f54f-376c5e6b840b@newmedia-net.de> <87tvabsp99.fsf@toke.dk> <74bccc2b-b805-255f-b6a7-83ade9af6765@newmedia-net.de> <87r25fsn70.fsf@toke.dk> <54438C64-C613-438E-9CB9-6C6D0C5EAFA0@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:43:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: <54438C64-C613-438E-9CB9-6C6D0C5EAFA0@gmail.com> (Jonathan Morton's message of "Tue, 20 Aug 2019 22:07:53 +0300") Message-ID: <87sgpvflo4.fsf@taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] cake in dd-wrt X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 23:43:11 -0000 Jonathan Morton writes: >> On 20 Aug, 2019, at 9:39 pm, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >>=20 >> =E2=80=A6a heavy bittorrent downloader will still steal the bandwidth of= my scp session. > > If you can identify the Bittorrent packets, you can mark them CS1, and > switch on Cake's "diffserv3" mode (as it is by default). Then the > Bittorrent packets will still be able to use full bandwidth if it's > available, but will be limited to 1/16th of the total if there is > contention. I regard the whole CS1 thing as having never been particularly successful for a variety of reasons - in particular because we seemed to be the only ones attempting to use it with rigor. I would like to patch in and submit "LE" support to mainline cake. The RFC retires CS1 - which I wouldn't retire - but see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8622.html Also it seems like a good idea to also submit the NS bit exclusion from the ack filter to mainline as well. > > - Jonathan Morton > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake