From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2AA03BA8E
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 09:35:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1529242557; bh=gOFWRoSRSY/1sdwlYGWGhhMa47F7Fd1wh+iA9gP3wO4=;
 h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=Rh88fapV0OR4ekJsSB0Paer2pDowno0luGpaPZ9oopflC3WBvKNpqZE+bSNR0qXTz
 4gkhXkNod2xGWUUYS1EPEXVsTcMYzGv8E1Dxmq5oO/llFMVGrizrqmgd9nikJzyYul
 tZzpStFUFe86XkAaK59gOnzE52QxZIq+7gFEFGsHPxk8ltvMHCL/nRYKGzE7BrNneP
 b5PHiTz3g2FoZ8/UzkGswbi6Q6PD6CD7VQj4lYLq795yAqjd/Os+GIGcUjCtP5Fblz
 14l377uw+fsSHKTsy7cO+QULsnerpaBiRPDz6p5PSggKQ/CchtAzsX1Th4Kx8sDpIh
 VpddoOI0isvrA==
To: Michel Blais <michel@targointernet.com>, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
In-Reply-To: <CAAWM72UjVRFCrpApxJmJXjKb_AmLF_zd07OCDHxVJ-hWai2KRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAWM72U2tZwFRSpLDpVNn1t0OZB=VDqAs89dUNCCNTDzD5vkFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87wov5hzvq.fsf@toke.dk> <20180611125425.792d4dcc@xeon-e3>
 <CAA93jw6UXES4UH_99NLX5VFXCL3P7_8_1ew0WKRgqB7rzPUwLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <6500246E-2382-48FD-8FC7-A15452D42042@heistp.net>
 <CAA93jw7NkpC=vnrtHwLrrSw+uRXgg16McKpoFniDAbqQySPufA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAWM72UjVRFCrpApxJmJXjKb_AmLF_zd07OCDHxVJ-hWai2KRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 15:35:55 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87sh5lv8lg.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Cake] Bandwidith rate by host instead of global while using
	[dual-]srchost and [dual-]dsthost
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 13:35:59 -0000

Michel Blais <michel@targointernet.com> writes:

> Thanks for the answers.
>
> @ Toke
>
> I was not clear on my first message but what I have in mind isn't
> individual shaping but more like a bandwidth limit identical for every
> dst-host, something like 50 mb/s by dst-host for every host instead of
> a global 1 Gb/s or 10 Gb/s without limit for everyone.

Whether or not the limit is the same for every host or not doesn't
really matter, does it? It's still per-host (or per-customer in the case
where the IP-to-customer mapping is not 1-to-1) shaping with an
arbitrary number of hosts?

-Toke