From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BD5F3B29E for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:38:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1523961526; bh=0JUeWOMJMzd8yHWWvHOMXCNkLHTD5V3j89ILooTrMpw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=qobjSDYfmzHFBF28Re0P1V4LwSlzkp9GcMre25dTTiUpGrtfN5mzilaDDExxsM13o T46530dy8AqN9DnmQwzkY9/9WRVY/aimuPzEnCiBVauYZa4ymDy2JFKlrMZMBu2kLJ SDi0cCrN67xh6IFlZcfGUbhX0a2IaL/pnvKehl9uocjS1fFFb+yUDb+Kh2LH53xdHO oUSLbhIwv2dWsI0z/X1Ik3hPdl3izMQbJm4LovrExH0BjsIb046tauYepvF85/oIOd 8iELYTMEOsNcpHMRi18BP8M31N5jdiS1MxzzhxGiDcdQ0E7+cKJCor6Iny0ctBOd34 1gq9m51FS7vbw== To: Luca Muscariello Cc: Cake List In-Reply-To: References: <87vacq419h.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:38:45 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87sh7u3yoa.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Cake] A few puzzling Cake results X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 10:38:47 -0000 Luca Muscariello writes: > 10Mbps/32 ~= 300kbps > > Does the VoIP stream use more than that 300kbps? > In the ideal case as long as the sparse flow has a rate which is lower than > the fair rate > the optimization should work. Otherwise the optimization might not as close > to ideal as possible. Yeah, except it's not just the bandwidth, it also depends on the quantum... ... which Cake automatically adjusts based on the configured rate, so that would explain why I'm getting different results. Thanks! :D -Toke