From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07D2B3B2A4 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:10:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1532639406; bh=xyUtL2Dm975XN2Gvq78yTLbMtfw0Y85bJO8knK6nyuw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=nwWEm8+vQfqLnd7PStwtSSEQ7x4+4dApxFWNuubRVOndZ3JQ5Fh/TywpHp8O8Lap+ bs+W67L2RJuum35oqB4B8s1jQFWEHgKNuwKXs17JEpKO3ykQXEPMJiPtBBoEtsrNyR 9BPxkOHABO8/QyxKkBCQjrghwbxE5OmTPGPia7UKLMZfKgNKrykE/zEcQEbpIPpxPx ONJPVs1CKUUp+A7635Js+Npq5M9L2VsIx5uIKqR5K5fifZQlHbck/LsOZJIqvkvLjO ufxZ02tJb9NNYdbk9ElUoJzUgZkhylBJcgBuwNWIPtlMrq/qvmqDoigfwoCvUsHqg9 taI006hcpWSsw== To: Dan Siemon , Dave Taht Cc: Cake List In-Reply-To: References: <1357421162.31089.1531812291583@webmail.strato.de> <1c323544b3076c0ab31b887d6113f25f572e41ae.camel@coverfire.com> <87woth28rw.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 23:09:58 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87tvol1z6h.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] =?utf-8?q?Using_cake_to_shape_1000=E2=80=99s_of_users=2E?= X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 21:10:08 -0000 Dan Siemon writes: > On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 19:42 +0200, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: >> Dan Siemon writes: >>=20 >> > I haven't had time to try Cake in this context yet but hope to get >> > to >> > that in the next couple months. I believe this will require one >> > Cake >> > instance per-subscriber like we do with FQ-CoDel today. >>=20 >> Yup, currently it would. It might be possible to extend CAKE's >> architecture to not require this, though. If you are interested in >> pursuing this in the future, let us know; having someone actually >> using >> it would be quite useful if we were to pursue development of this :) > > Yes, I'm very interested in this. A single QDisc would simplify things > quite a bit and hopefully be a perf win. > > I'm happy to test this locally and with real subscribers once it is > stable enough. Cool. No promises as to when (or even if) I get around to looking at this; but will ping you when/if I do :) -Toke