From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506DA21F7FA
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310;
	t=1446113042; bh=c1XmlE15MZtlLYnNpdSC12xLWYc3M0YuRfseNe5WZxM=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=TEqy6ah0hmNSSiElWmtul2pV5CGukyCYQ2IdpmYdtI0OtN7HVAyGME6efNh9Zp547
	U+gCBDMzdGwq4oRWVQBX+2NrukzJSj9DsQ57uwqZyE1b/rrATSfLVW5Tgkw8Dr2IK5
	8Z4YKHaLdStmw78N3c8ak/H8NQm8s6KsXQ3+3NIk=
Sender: toke@toke.dk
Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 52C1B49D67; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:04:01 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
References: <CAA93jw4_CtZz4_nsy6u7gpNCTz3gi-nYXZHqqoXgYJ9cJ9QrpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<A2C044B7-3BCE-47C0-B716-5107B8DB91E7@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:04:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <A2C044B7-3BCE-47C0-B716-5107B8DB91E7@gmx.de> (Sebastian
	Moeller's message of "Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:56:29 +0100")
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87twpaf0tq.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] memory
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:04:27 -0000

Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> writes:

> 	This is all quite interesting and correct; the point I failed to make
> clearly it seems, is that a 50MB limit on a 64MB router can not be called=
 sane
> or safe, no matter how you slice or dice it=E2=80=A6 It is one thing havi=
ng cake tell me
> that it thinks the limit I gave is to low to reach full throughput as lon=
g as it
> accepts the given limit.

Well, a solution would be to not configure your 64-MB router with a
100Mbit / 1000ms connection :)

-Toke