From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: "Cong Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Jonas Köppeler" <j.koeppeler@tu-berlin.de>,
cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Cake] Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/4] Multi-queue aware sch_cake
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 13:31:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v7kj597f.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM0EoMnkOoA1x0o4VQ35kS-Sa69QSCRwmQBtVx5hEF9qo6rv4A@mail.gmail.com>
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 8:16 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> This series adds a multi-queue aware variant of the sch_cake scheduler,
>> called 'cake_mq'. Using this makes it possible to scale the rate shaper
>> of sch_cake across multiple CPUs, while still enforcing a single global
>> rate on the interface.
>>
>> The approach taken in this patch series is to implement a separate qdisc
>> called 'cake_mq', which is based on the existing 'mq' qdisc, but differs
>> in a couple of aspects:
>>
>> - It will always install a cake instance on each hardware queue (instead
>> of using the default qdisc for each queue like 'mq' does).
>>
>> - The cake instances on the queues will share their configuration, which
>> can only be modified through the parent cake_mq instance.
>>
>> Doing things this way does incur a bit of code duplication (reusing the
>> 'mq' qdisc code), but it simplifies user configuration by centralising
>> all configuration through the cake_mq qdisc (which also serves as an
>> obvious way of opting into the multi-queue aware behaviour).
>>
>> The cake_mq qdisc takes all the same configuration parameters as the
>> cake qdisc, plus on additional parameter to control the sync time
>> between the individual cake instances.
>>
>> We are posting this series to solicit feedback on the API, as well as
>> wider testing of the multi-core shaper.
>>
>> An earlier version of this work was presented at this year's Netdevconf:
>> https://netdevconf.info/0x19/sessions/talk/mq-cake-scaling-software-rate-limiting-across-cpu-cores.html
>>
>> The patch series is structured as follows:
>>
>> - Patch 1 factors out the sch_cake configuration variables into a
>> separate struct that can be shared between instances.
>>
>> - Patch 2 adds the basic cake_mq qdisc, based on the mq code
>>
>> - Patch 3 adds configuration sharing across the cake instances installed
>> under cake_mq
>>
>> - Patch 4 adds the shared shaper state that enables the multi-core rate
>> shaping
>>
>> A patch to iproute2 to make it aware of the cake_mq qdisc is included as
>> a separate patch as part of this series.
>>
>
> For this version of the patchset
> Reviewed-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Thanks!
> Q: Does Eric's riddance of busylock help?
Good question! Probably not for cake_mq usage itself, but maybe it'll
change the baseline? We'll test this before sending a non-RFC :)
-Toke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-13 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 12:16 [Cake] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-09-24 12:16 ` [Cake] [PATCH RFC net-next 1/4] net/sched: sch_cake: Factor out config variables into separate struct Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-09-24 12:16 ` [Cake] [PATCH RFC net-next 2/4] net/sched: sch_cake: Add cake_mq qdisc for using cake on mq devices Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-09-24 12:16 ` [Cake] [PATCH RFC net-next 3/4] net/sched: sch_cake: Share config across cake_mq sub-qdiscs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-09-24 12:16 ` [Cake] [PATCH RFC net-next 4/4] net/sched: sch_cake: share shaper state across sub-instances of cake_mq Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-09-25 9:04 ` [Cake] " Donald Hunter
2025-09-25 13:29 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-09-24 12:18 ` [Cake] [PATCH RFC net-next] tc: cake: add cake_mq support Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-10-12 15:51 ` [Cake] Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/4] Multi-queue aware sch_cake Jamal Hadi Salim
2025-10-13 11:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v7kj597f.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=j.koeppeler@tu-berlin.de \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox