From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CECE3B29E for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 05:11:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1537348297; bh=Z1fYAFJTFvBbcNwVDNtqtMkHycfIOB/PK8+3Q5tmSrA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=QMX6FGYsg4H9uuyqmAOlDESp9xfZ9445Xa9Ty0cOl3BRnYcrnyj08+vjgpi0odNMI tKnuDfj+rJrVwglCHVSnESZOkg1tvuyCSy8mPH53lnJAiQjoPyjUhkpHGBkARWM1+t oIe6NMKhlfN1oi4p1mYfqmzFCnNqNKgWbvdNtiYtvBHE24LP6gYhk0P4011K0HVufb esNtu3FM/yo344jeaz2DOmX1f5qLeJRqzKpSPCgvC8UjIx711SFzj/s6A9Beag6fZi KnfMvNPEUomlSRGURaXoy/w/3h3g9V4mahC4qM3MKDUM8qd3skYPp2BJbIr78HD9Rz Gw36KkQ7gCVUQ== To: Ruben Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: <1645d6fe-d5f2-4416-beed-ae5ac71170f8@email.android.com> References: <1645d6fe-d5f2-4416-beed-ae5ac71170f8@email.android.com> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:11:36 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87va71kg1j.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] Munin-Plugins X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:11:38 -0000 Ruben writes: > Hey Toke, > > Am 13.09.2018 21:12 schrieb Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen : > > > Ruben writes: > > > Hey Toke, > > > > Thanks for your fast response! > > > > Am 13.09.2018 12:27 schrieb Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen : > > > > > > Ruben writes: > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > I've already mentioned this in a response to dtaht on GitHub,= but > here > > > again for everyone: > > > > > > I was wondering if it's possible to extend the tin statistics= by > > > packets for backlog. > > > > Why do you need packets when there's already bytes? > > > > Easy: dtaht requested a packets graph with ecn marks, which is also > > packets, so backlog as bytes do not fit, backlog as packets do. > > > > The idea was to do a multi-graph which is one graph with combined > > stats for all tins and sub graphs for all tins. > > > > On the main graph a backlog in packets is available, but I would ne= ed > > to leave out the backlog for the tins, which is somewhat confusing. > > Why not just do both backlogs in bytes? > > There's no counter for ecn marked packets in bytes, so it's impossible to > implement it that way, too. > > ECN-Marks is in packets, so everything else need to be in packets as > well. Hmm, so the obvious follow-up question would be "why do you need to have backlog and number of drops on the same graph?" :) -Toke