From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Ruben <ruben@vfn-nrw.de>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Munin-Plugins
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 21:12:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87va798b5h.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c268b53-f921-471e-bc14-61fe2e66ed86@email.android.com>
Ruben <ruben@vfn-nrw.de> writes:
> Hey Toke,
>
> Thanks for your fast response!
>
> Am 13.09.2018 12:27 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>:
>
>
> Ruben <ruben@vfn-nrw.de> writes:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I've already mentioned this in a response to dtaht on GitHub, but here
> > again for everyone:
> >
> > I was wondering if it's possible to extend the tin statistics by
> > packets for backlog.
>
> Why do you need packets when there's already bytes?
>
> Easy: dtaht requested a packets graph with ecn marks, which is also
> packets, so backlog as bytes do not fit, backlog as packets do.
>
> The idea was to do a multi-graph which is one graph with combined
> stats for all tins and sub graphs for all tins.
>
> On the main graph a backlog in packets is available, but I would need
> to leave out the backlog for the tins, which is somewhat confusing.
Why not just do both backlogs in bytes?
> > Also I haven't found details on the man page, but haven't looked in
> > the code how exactly flows are defined for the new 2 level fair
> > queueings.
>
> A flow is a flow (hash on the regular 5-tuple). Unless you install
> custom tc filters, in which case a flow could be anything you want it to
> be...
>
> > I would like to show hosts as well as flows in a graph, in the various
> > states as summary as well as per tin. But hosts aren't shown in the
> > statistics. But they could be helpful to see unexpected rises if
> > someone is abusing the system.
>
> Hmm, guess we could do "number of hosts per tin" accounting as well as
> flows. But it would be bloating up the already bloated statistics. But
> on the other hand, they are already quite bloated, so another pair of
> stats maybe wouldn't make much of a difference?
>
>
> How important is a row more or less? It's quite verbose already (what
> I like) - as long as the number is available without much additionally
> work needed.
It's the additional complexity of recording the stats internally in cake
I'm worried about, not the extra lines of output :)
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-13 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-11 2:22 Ruben
2018-09-11 10:44 ` Georgios Amanakis
2018-09-13 9:35 ` Ruben
2018-09-13 10:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-09-13 19:00 ` Ruben
2018-09-13 19:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2018-09-19 3:35 ` Ruben
2018-09-19 9:11 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-09-19 17:01 ` Dave Taht
2018-09-20 1:35 ` Ruben
2018-09-20 1:39 ` Ruben
2018-09-20 2:13 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87va798b5h.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ruben@vfn-nrw.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox