From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97CA3CB35
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:11:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1524075066; bh=Zl7Wiu+NBupCto+L/B+znkUuhxNPx/+xVsM9h2TS2lE=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=KjfAKhmngtEmzkAbuAqyB+bUkiIju12lpz2vpw2CkZMGXwMaZNOy5+tLuzeKU+KR/
 TLF3QvbO6F5owcjFNP7kBQO34EWON3wOXYO9aPF7ZlCfFrCNCx8H4nPCc0fnwj/La4
 kHCxeI88Czd80qeFGnS2kRYKt7Vkw2BozPRtIF0VaMu38Z/U3VBiLSnCgaRMasdCoX
 iAVDd5U0gpUPWjmAGQJQ9ZkOGVXSAIMldRHPGrzJiTMg6PcAE99WZYTegenGWEX5DP
 ZC/6F3dsleNyXuE55XDnjfqwRiFlqzGvSY1hcMtEFIQOd7cx8mN/FH7xx2SxjvQBFM
 0Qgsf/ceWDwoQ==
To: Jonas =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=A5rtensson?= <martensson.jonas@gmail.com>, Dave
 Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAM9iV=+xQVY2h7eQa1WDVFD=JN=U1xoq4oia0fdrB2ByQZeycw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87vacq419h.fsf@toke.dk>
 <C0095700-7A65-4259-84E5-C3A113608D96@gmail.com> <874lk9533l.fsf@toke.dk>
 <87604o3get.fsf@toke.dk> <578552B2-5127-451A-AFE8-93AE9BB07368@gmail.com>
 <87r2nc1taq.fsf@toke.dk> <FCA9E4F3-EA5C-4223-BA23-771C993867AF@gmail.com>
 <0BB8B1FD-6A00-49D6-806E-794BD53A449F@gmx.de>
 <3457DD8E-0292-4802-BD1E-B37771DCADA2@gmail.com> <87fu3s1om2.fsf@toke.dk>
 <5BD20E12-2408-4393-8560-3FDA52D86DB3@gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw6jWnVw1_6N6G4P3YmBy+jH6XeBXTaYvD7Pg7iqvYxiOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM9iV=+xQVY2h7eQa1WDVFD=JN=U1xoq4oia0fdrB2ByQZeycw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:11:02 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87vaco8jwp.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Cake] A few puzzling Cake results
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 18:11:07 -0000

Jonas M=C3=A5rtensson <martensson.jonas@gmail.com> writes:

> Dave, in the thread referenced earlier that led to this change you said:
>
> "The loss of throughput here compared to non-ingress mode is a blocker for
> mainlining and for that matter, wedging this into lede."
>
> I'm curious, what would the latency be in Toke's experiment with
> non-ingress mode and with the 4 MTU change reverted? The same as for
> fq_codel?

Yeah, I'm planning to run some more tests with and without ingress mode
and with and without the target scaling. Just need to finish writing up
the paper on Cake first; there's a deadline looming on Friday...

-Toke