From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7BE13B2A4 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 05:48:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1531648086; bh=kR0Vj5YwTyfmi7ihkRHu9J1mj4CyOPfdJblHnJ9+RF8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=a2z+EuBW+fIQQZUgIwxxV+EZUPPild3R/wUln918A34ok2mg9gkXJvetszGn9DoQW uQ1Gc7JBhTNVqTtUFyf+3zFx2UGadBxYvfEH5ckgUODjEIwaRarSRIeH7iFaWl1EHB Iv8L5IpHcLHMioyfNkuV8D9PDBufju2ighiT0oxC3gUHImoAp1huz8m/MrIN2gHkWl msE1CbI1soYvSviY1MBlyJnfqPy7QWiA/thq/1ZNY2OrXTCAhLb/1PzzhcL3Oo7CwW dgAAbQpRq5QNgyLjMWrTf8GNQnDJ6aP4cJr5o0tfpJ8Qsn4k+khlv8BauSG74KVjOv 0oBmWOns/QOdQ== To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: <4C12C6A1-84E3-4B78-885F-F5C212CD13FF@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> References: <8736wla3lq.fsf@toke.dk> <4C12C6A1-84E3-4B78-885F-F5C212CD13FF@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 11:48:02 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87wotw96el.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] Backporting 'tc class' support X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 09:48:09 -0000 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes: >> On 14 Jul 2018, at 22:50, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: >>=20 >> Now that CAKE has been accepted upstream, I figured it was a good time >> to backport the 'tc class' support. So I did, back to kernel v4.9. >>=20 >> This is in the master branch; anyone feel like testing? With this, the >> version of CAKE in the master branch should be identical to the version >> that will be in Linux 4.19 :) > > I need the attached patch to get it to build on openwrt - it looks > like an include guard order thing. Ah, right, thanks! Fixed in master :) -Toke