From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03F373B2A4 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:23:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1523913793; bh=V3GIMrcqJXb7Q3ARmPLxaKD4M95NHdALO76d8IfWAVA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ospROQROujJUSmq0gjfXkrwFZ27tXqBrpNTuiZgNUknf56Nln3S3RgeC+pnpLISa2 Ei/bdRMCmla4GVC1RL9vK8Alk0LLfGqz2arZz+oTckjZ5UTTtwYYz+ilSw+vWxhfXK arssRbkq4qT6dpoYWuZOAiWGsazOpgRmBpd2ESTB49VZAKawbTD7qwSOR/6cFo9Q7B BE3Q2RwQsqkXmcpq2JySviB1dKHH76dBhTB1cDc0OWPj3LzEMHUddydnI2wtRHcg8h jn+ri+IuHBXqM+8nIs8MHWrBU6OBL1sbFJ2t5ZdNPrxjG+hH1H0XcTDc/gOhiJmGoY sPOrz3ffRBCBA== To: Pete Heist Cc: Dave Taht , Cake List In-Reply-To: <612F0368-751A-4127-B1F4-139FF5C3D315@eventide.io> References: <20180416.110000.1863692416063182988.davem@davemloft.net> <87efjf5gne.fsf@toke.dk> <612F0368-751A-4127-B1F4-139FF5C3D315@eventide.io> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 23:23:12 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87wox64zi7.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] net-next is OPEN... X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 21:23:15 -0000 Pete Heist writes: >> On Apr 16, 2018, at 5:12 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: >>=20 >> Dave Taht writes: >>=20 >>> do we consider cake ready this time? >>=20 >> I'm not aware of anything outstanding, at least... > > Do I have the release cycle right that it would have to be upstreamed > by =E2=80=9Cabout 10 weeks=E2=80=9D from now and would end up in 4.18 > (https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt)? Assuming it is accepted, yes... :) > I remember that fairness behavior at low RTTs (< 20ms) needed to be > either improved or documented, and don=E2=80=99t see anything about that = in > the man page in the tc-adv repo thus far. Summarizing the host > isolation results at > http://www.drhleny.cz/bufferbloat/cake/round2/#hostiso_cake_{rtt}_{qos-id} > : > > RTT: fairness (1.0 =3D=3D perfect fairness) > --- > 100us: 2.22 > 1ms: 1.7 > 2ms: 1.6 > 3ms: 1.42 > 5ms: 1.31 > 8ms: 1.16 > 10ms: 1.12 > 20ms: 1.02 > 40ms: 1.017 Erm, what's the metric and which data source are you looking at here? -Toke