From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9665A3B29E
 for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri,  5 May 2017 09:59:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1493992790; bh=CCK4TIZqPOTA1q3/Pms4DKHDfjXDSKK56Qv/Sq/2N9Q=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=g118BZAWyQRGbNqOQZvLMnfZgBj8/nRTVLiFFbLzJyr1yMYORFYm1CY6YYQC5P47r
 uAqJMOK3OrOTCLm67SCW4PziSjdnyPpI8dHsDXpxGftkFx9NlyiGsoTRD1micxxuOG
 Immh6pMaS1mcuIyaP8gEIAtSSsT1lGTTXq1riQUfulnCBOh1LyYAlt21DcWqb87YCB
 Rnp/QE9JbZudCZAD/hk0Jj9V00TotbyBO8KKYM06OT/+FEspfiRH35DI8/7y3/Yeb/
 MRNOIWS07H2bT60yq59xwScdEzAtP848+eTxT8pjKV0MkS1TUrtbJnEeN/JGy+2o8z
 D7hnFkLgSj0TQ==
To: <erik.taraldsen@telenor.com>
Cc: <moeller0@gmx.de>,  cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
References: <1493989225450.12354@telenor.com>
 <BEEC56FE-E302-407D-AC82-80CEB31AD57E@gmx.de>
 <1493992526496.9641@telenor.com>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 15:59:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1493992526496.9641@telenor.com> (erik taraldsen's message of
 "Fri, 5 May 2017 13:55:26 +0000")
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87wp9vjtex.fsf@alrua-kau>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Cake] ER-X now running cake, thanks for the help. :)
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
 <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 13:59:52 -0000

<erik.taraldsen@telenor.com> writes:

>> Fra: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
>
>> .. snip <good explanations and tips>=20
>> One problem with the unelastic load is that as far as I can tell no flow=
 on the open internet is=20
>> allows/assumed to behave like that (isn=E2=80=99t the default tcp-friend=
ly, and inelastic DOS traffic is=20
>> essentially out-lawed?)
>
> You are right in that single stream udp without any feedback is a
> quite unrealistic load. It is however usually a good indicator of
> possible trouble with bufferbloat. When I get delays in the multiple
> seconds range there usually is no point in running more realistic
> tests such as flent, so I tend to start with that udp test before
> setting up a lab. Current record found in production systems is 34
> seconds.

How are you measuring latency in this case?

-Toke