From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2a0c:4d80:42:2001::664]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 990283B2A4 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 06:37:25 -0500 (EST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1677152243; bh=YghsvhSreuHS5ACAp6uov6GNPlSpkLd0BSqVRjGANXo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=KlUFReLjVNbS/a08lYrOUOgPx0hj4jriwU8W+BgBtnFCaSakfy3Vm75OTjCA8N36H Qqjkp4w/GOEsX5qp2meCJUU2fTU6i0QGnJmQOoiVMsuXWmP7K627rbfI5Ib4Tl9sFt ZWYj54W5tNdZuv73fnKsN72/s7yYoys2dGWmk8KtLvyLYiNvHHSPKpgpYNGgl5xRbN FYT+OxZFfvsJmu9esiAUf8HhxXUOf7IzIUgYrvYtk2RDkWpmvTbPt9VGy4fBUKJZNf tvV/oPe1QMbLACQCmyyZX7RmwKbI8tCY9v1vORc8Tzd1IR66srEfqIvQqmOMniB9fx uuMDwkfUINz7A== To: Jonathan Morton , Dave Taht Cc: Cake List In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:37:23 +0100 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87y1oolij0.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Cake] big tcp X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 11:37:25 -0000 Jonathan Morton via Cake writes: >> On 23 Feb, 2023, at 3:35 am, Dave Taht via Cake wrote: >> >> does this break cake? >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/de811bf3-e2d8-f727-72bc-c8a754a9d929@tessares.net/T/ > > It looks like they've included patches *to* Cake to handle anticipated > breakage. This is one of the great things about having it upstreamed. Yup, indeed. In this case they did so without Cc'ing the maintainer, though :( -Toke