From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk (mail2.tohojo.dk [77.235.48.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F01FE21F716 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 10:51:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.tohojo.dk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=201310; t=1446663068; bh=Pv/HXA+b2lz4W2a91Z/L7O+ylSWITv5lvVzj9KqfxMQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=GMT4NOjThHtPeK9nHdlVKtgnh4VgOJzL4wN88tlZYGYozE7dogZ5APUAwHP44r9ow Y8aVHCLm9M7eD4AuHfJZttJGEP3z4qvbJyC0YQ+/Y6o+fL0Jor9FSS+10axz+xkiso eUHQg5E6Nx+5fhvU2D+uwrMOzC7BxYQtF1JAfh60= Sender: toke@toke.dk Received: by alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 33A3A4EBCE5; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 19:51:07 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant References: <87oafbnsqn.fsf@toke.dk> <5638B29D.9020503@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <87k2pzns29.fsf@toke.dk> <6F28B0F0-8333-4753-802E-BDDAC42CBC7B@gmail.com> <87oafbat54.fsf@toke.dk> <877flzas49.fsf@toke.dk> <87pozqaomi.fsf@toke.dk> <8737wm9g1y.fsf@toke.dk> <563A48AA.1080405@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 19:51:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <563A48AA.1080405@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> (Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2015 18:04:26 +0000") X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87y4ed8up0.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cake] Correct 'change' behaviour X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:51:35 -0000 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant writes: > Doesn't the comment in the code say in essence "if it's the same type of > qdisc then the operation is a change, else the operation is (an atomic) > remove/add" ? Or did I mis-read it. Hmm, that's not how I understood the comment (nor the code). But it certainly seems that that is what happens. Asked on netdev, let's see what they say... :) -Toke