From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 452973B260; Fri, 20 May 2016 12:43:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id e126so26333818lfg.2; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:43:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ciyy7IbxTZ6OuwvkNHkwURtcv5zcVkJRwY4CXNM5MIk=; b=VNetVYn/UxeTpSvFBr5xZUn47vx0AtLC3OFZeXtB4GcIzn5Y12/E41H4cTA0qfQ5ck blRbzyFkfajGp4nZiQIXYnf3qTwPvrpSdJyNaCBR6mS8TIZrNsh+UV9zuYPeY3Oz8Xd9 BmQbzPq8QVaok3loJSEiIW8rThP0BELq+ARGvn8vU8KEfhqaB1sckdpM0uVJuRUvEZic PGNm5clEBSt3Q7Alg0Vlam1nN8BSihy/6Y8pcPemAVN6GVHuBWOSQhvrlyetthCJDBTT IGOILSL0c4GOWa7TkWDlw6nqWjIdSRma/McvxznUF9ABQgITgiNsyJAij4mV7ZWLF3rJ uLoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ciyy7IbxTZ6OuwvkNHkwURtcv5zcVkJRwY4CXNM5MIk=; b=REYa94rPe0G7efSEWRf68jPDVV0PRHjEd4bzPhi0KJZJeADxY9X8LrxolpuAjVJ/0z D6tBMEDGtIFddd/EWHwFMqa5urC/TE/uwm0H34FTp66FFUhJX1l6ugENGPNDF2PjVvvc riauKwSlZxs8XMQsLCpV7cVAAA2cKfuJ3QkfBVyIOKd6zQ8DQbXZefFkiUP7cfgP8IfO Qy/lWCQdQarqQStfd3v23CWiS2A/DbsuGg6EdEjzxAtMjiK9fsWwO5ugIHZq9OpG0lm3 i7huN7zWklvFQwJzlzPO5O6dFw51oAkpB35Y6U3fSNXkQ6qgAljk2ikFqmYEgBDHFDic /Upg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVRsXqNj4gLizaJpykcpFep1E622DMpSR4ZjWLM/449FCpOVTE1cBP9pkpvKnjj4Q== X-Received: by 10.25.218.14 with SMTP id r14mr1491516lfg.120.1463762625133; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (188-67-138-144.bb.dnainternet.fi. [188.67.138.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z1sm3441154lbw.2.2016.05.20.09.43.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 20 May 2016 09:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 19:43:43 +0300 Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8AB0D25D-C1CA-45F1-889E-2F73CF8C44F7@gmail.com> References: <22371476-B45C-4E81-93C0-D39A67639EA0@gmx.de> <857AEE56-E7DB-4981-B32E-82473F877139@gmail.com> To: "Luis E. Garcia" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Subject: Re: [Cake] Proposing COBALT X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 16:43:46 -0000 > On 20 May, 2016, at 19:37, Luis E. Garcia wrote: >=20 > I think this would be a great idea to implement and test. > Can COBALT's behavior be easily implemented to test it using the = OpenWRT or LEVE ? I assume you mean LEDE. Yes, the BLUE algorithm is very simple (and is already in Linux, if you = want to see how it behaves independently). It=E2=80=99s merely a case = of modifying a fork of sch_codel and/or sch_fq_codel and/or sch_cake to = run it in parallel with the Codel algorithm. I=E2=80=99ll probably get around to it once I=E2=80=99ve got some = current Cake changes out of the way. - Jonathan Morton