From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF673B25D for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 04:40:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dair-2430.local (p508114FC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.129.20.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89A041F456 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 08:40:53 +0000 (UTC) To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Dave_T=c3=a4ht?= Message-ID: <92c333bb-be1a-c3e0-ca76-67d6b322ca0c@taht.net> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:40:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Cake] CAKE on FTTH in Mauritius X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 08:40:54 -0000 On 7/31/16 10:29 AM, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > Thanks, and here's the result with transmission running on another box > in the house: > > https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4583052 > > Something that I notice right away is that it seems that CAKE has less > "burstiness" than fq_codel in simple.qos configuration. > > Btw, I'm using piece of cake as the QoS profile. Well, I would try to stress it out harder against a more local netperf server. If you can set one up on a data center in your country I can toss it into the global dns as "netperf-something.bufferbloat.net" > > > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> Pretty impressive result. >> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Loganaden Velvindron >> wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Got myself an archer c7 v2 with lede: (HEAD, r1185), on a 30Mbit/s >>> (download) and 4Mbit/s upload. >>> >>> here is the result using dslreports: >>> https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4582998. >>> >>> It looks to be working fine to me so far. >>> >>> capacity estimate: 3Mbit >>> Tin 0 >>> thresh 3Mbit >>> target 15.0ms >>> interval 300.0ms >>> pk_delay 790us >>> av_delay 318us >>> sp_delay 10us >>> pkts 23772 >>> bytes 10352566 >>> way_inds 0 >>> way_miss 295 >>> way_cols 0 >>> drops 56 >>> marks 0 >>> sp_flows 1 >>> bk_flows 1 >>> un_flows 0 >>> max_len 1514 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cake mailing list >>> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! >> http://blog.cerowrt.org > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >