Re: [Cake] flow_hash vs host_hash

[Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>]

Hi Toke,


On Oct 6, 2015, at 10:28 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:

> Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> writes:
> 
>> Hi Toke,
>> 
>> On Oct 6, 2015, at 10:13 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
>> 
>>> Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> writes:
>>> 
>>>> 	I believe you nailed it, but the pony will still work on egress,
>>> 
>>> Don't packets hit the qdisc after NAT has been applied?
>> 
>> 	As far as I know not for IFBs; that is the reason why we need tc filters
>> on ingress and can not use netfilter. And why using iptables to map the DSCP to
>> zero will still result in our shaper seeing the DSCP markings from upstream
>> (which I could confirm happening for IPv6, as my ISP conserved flent’s DSCP
>> marks, so I saw nice priority band based stratification in flent's graphics). I
>> think that IFBs predecessor IMQ was different in that regard.
> 
> No, I meant on egress...
> 
> -Toke

Ah, I see. I guess you are right, but on egress we could get back to the pre-nat addresses, like Vincent does in nxt_routed_hfsc.qos?

Best Regards
	Sebastian