From: Y <intruder_tkyf@yahoo.fr>
To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake, low speed ADSL & fwmark
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 23:52:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fc635d1-6ba3-64a3-74ff-a279e4039e10@yahoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD9MmSc54e2NaVnqAVSw8Nk2MbdFr0OFXtT4RC2TUKuDcg0_PA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,all
My situation is/was similer.
I prefer to use cake because it costs lower cpu time than htb + fq_codel.
tc qdisc add root dev eth0 cake bandwidth 810kbit pppoa-vcmux diffserv4
ack-filter-aggressive dual-srchost
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ tc -s qdisc show dev eth0
qdisc cake 8023: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 810Kbit diffserv4 dual-srchost
nonat nowash ack-filter-aggressive split-gso rtt 100.0ms atm overhead 10
Sent 18265833249 bytes 23590044 pkt (dropped 7172987, overlimits
53950415 requeues 11)
backlog 1444b 1p requeues 11
memory used: 130147b of 4Mb
capacity estimate: 810Kbit
min/max network layer size: 30 / 1478
min/max overhead-adjusted size: 53 / 1643
average network hdr offset: 14
Bulk Best Effort Video Voice
thresh 50624bit 810Kbit 405Kbit 202496bit
target 356.5ms 22.3ms 44.6ms 89.1ms
interval 713.0ms 117.3ms 139.6ms 184.1ms
pk_delay 62.6ms 132.6ms 13.8ms 86.4ms
av_delay 9.0ms 42.3ms 7.2ms 14.8ms
sp_delay 1.3ms 5.5ms 981us 3.6ms
backlog 0b 1444b 0b 0b
pkts 369 30744151 8116 10396
bytes 19926 23924477414 438264 5958198
way_inds 0 6553855 4 1
way_miss 250 1048934 4749 205
way_cols 0 0 0 0
drops 0 4430387 0 0
marks 0 7611 0 0
ack_drop 0 2742600 0 0
sp_flows 1 4 1 1
bk_flows 0 2 0 0
un_flows 0 0 0 0
max_len 54 2984 54 590
quantum 300 300 300 300
On 28/07/2020 06:41, Jim Geo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for all the efforts you have done to make internet usable.
>
> I currently use htb & fq_codel in my low speed ADSL 6Mbps downlink/1
> Mbps uplink. I use fwmark to control both uplink and downlink with good
> results in terms of bandwidth allocation. Streaming video is chopping
> bulk traffic successfully.
>
> Is setting up cake worth the effort at such low speeds? Would it reduce
> latency?
>
> Regarding fwmark can you please elaborate more on the calculations
> performed? Man page is not that helpful.
>
> My understanding is this:
>
> I use 1,2,3,4 as marks of traffic.
> If I set the mask to 0xffffff[..] the marks will remain unchanged. Then
> right shifting will occur for the unset bits, so they will land on tins
> 1,1,3,1
>
> Can you please correct me? If logical and performed between mask and
> mark value?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-28 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-27 21:41 Jim Geo
2020-07-27 22:46 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-07-28 16:51 ` Jim Geo
2020-07-28 16:54 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-07-28 16:56 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-07-28 14:52 ` Y [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9fc635d1-6ba3-64a3-74ff-a279e4039e10@yahoo.fr \
--to=intruder_tkyf@yahoo.fr \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox