Re: [Cake] [Bloat] Two questions re high speed congestionmanagement anddatagram protocols

[Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1615 bytes --]

For what it is worth, the tsv working group is considering whether to process mp-dccp on the standards track, but then the IETF seems not to care too deeply about open-source licence compliance. Or recent kernel implementations or implementations that have a realistic path towards mainline inclusion... but I digress.

Regards
        Sebastian





On 10 July 2023 22:35:40 CEST, Stephen Hemminger via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 10:32:32 -0400 (EDT)
>"David P. Reed" <dpreed@deepplum.com> wrote:
>
>> How to find a kernel maintainer to care about DCCP, seems to be the question for Linux.
>> I am tempted... Not to get involved with IETF "barriers" (what a mess, given the folks in IETF who resisted in AQM, I wouldn't last a minute), but to keep DCCP support alive.
>> The barrier here is getting accepted as a Linux maintainer, which is a different issue entirely, looking at my last two experiences with submitting simple bug fixes to the kernel, which were nightmares. I don't have the commitment to become accepted as a maintainer.
>> But it seems good to maintain DCCP, despite its lack of popularity as an IETF standard. It does deal with CC in a way that simplifies use of UDP for serious work.
>
>Interesting that there is an out of tree DCCP, complete with likely GPL license violation.
>https://github.com/telekom/mp-dccp
>_______________________________________________
>Bloat mailing list
>Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2252 bytes --]