From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: Ryan Mounce <ryan@mounce.com.au>, Cake List <Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] overheads or rate calculation changed?
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 17:21:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A8C4DFC5-179A-4EE5-9758-6DB57F83B8F2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A440F25E-9C63-4199-A252-81CFC719989E@gmx.de>
> On 7 Jan, 2018, at 10:19 am, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> We really need this "behave like all other qdiscs" mode so that cake can be used with "tc stab" exactly as awkward as all other qdiscs, it would be really unfortunate if cake would require different "tc stab" magic than say HTB+fq_codel.
Okay, that's a valid use-case for not molesting the packet size at all. I'll have to think about how best to interface that to userspace.
>> If you then specify "overhead 34", you'll get exactly that, relative to the transport-layer packet (that is, IP).
>
> That is the best thing to do agreed, but from your description above I am not sure about the exact conditions you propose to do that.
It'll be what you get in all cases, *unless* you specifically invoke the stab-compatible behaviour.
- Jonathan Morton
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-07 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-18 20:32 Andy Furniss
2017-12-21 0:54 ` Andy Furniss
2017-12-22 6:38 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-22 7:58 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE3e-CbJ8X_Bpu3AhwbVmq-yD89HGe7rSNMTYqj+KSaBUg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-12-22 10:00 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-22 12:58 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2017-12-22 15:55 ` Dave Taht
2017-12-22 23:38 ` Andy Furniss
2017-12-23 9:41 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-12-23 9:59 ` Andy Furniss
2017-12-23 12:55 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-12-23 13:11 ` Ryan Mounce
2017-12-23 14:21 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-12-23 21:03 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-12-23 21:20 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-24 10:34 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2017-12-24 10:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-24 10:46 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2017-12-24 12:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-12-24 12:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-01-06 20:44 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-06 22:46 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-01-07 0:33 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-07 8:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-01-07 15:21 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A8C4DFC5-179A-4EE5-9758-6DB57F83B8F2@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=ryan@mounce.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox