From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A3E3B29E for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 05:59:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 11:59:05 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1524909545; bh=Ptk3Uy5grMUISbFAGp6ZUShiRbTFJ5FXpwcpzS3Zkdw=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:CC:From:From; b=xmPU4Jl0PAyu3oU9T2bLepQnfd7eXsoyGrKRprYV554aOBpNikeiMzw/kFG8ZaAC4 7ozNb2UV9+T6qACUdF8F0LuwxW24fDyGOyevbzgyiUxdCetJIXrBx02nRNYgwk9rlH 4SU93mqXVEijpGm6Fqsd9Yt7cz8aiVvRCWOA+95S8ppwncisyPdnYpZQV1xGSfXQPW 8bxvH4PuZ7wkPVncPQR5iMtKFK8aelSpEgGSA6dnd/1XLM35IwOZZDEOEQR3i1i7Bc LpaGHe9URnyxUuNaz0W1jPQ2AFFi6bHm+afa3fqIpDfD7S1UIZkhIAgi+MwdzvJq6A n9ajNCotR+W3w== In-Reply-To: <684633C8-153D-46D9-9184-31F5AF4DA475@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> References: <877eos4rl3.fsf@toke.dk> <684633C8-153D-46D9-9184-31F5AF4DA475@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant CC: Cake List From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Cake] Thanks to Toke X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 09:59:07 -0000 On 28 April 2018 10:48:17 CEST, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > > >> On 27 Apr 2018, at 16:06, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen >wrote: >>=20 >> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant via Cake write= s: >>=20 >>> Thank you Toke for your continued and continuing efforts in >submitting >>> CAKE to upstream kernel land=2E I am at least one person who greatly >>> values and appreciates your time and efforts in doing so=E2=80=A6=2E a= nd >>> wrangling the rest of us into =E2=80=98little=E2=80=99 tweaks here & t= here=2E >>=20 >> Thanks, much appreciated! >>=20 >> On that note, if someone could take a look at the changes to the ACK >> filtering I just pushed, that would be awesome (running a test with >it, >> but would be good if someone else could sanity-check it)=2E > >Well I have it running based on commit >729c81a3be16cdd574935cc9de62ba1d5ce52fcf from last night with ack >filtering enabled, not that my link=E2=80=99s 4:! up/down ratio really ne= eds it >:-) Does it actually filter any ACKs if you run a TCP download on a 6in4 conne= ction? As Ryan pointed out, I think I may have broken that :P -Toke