From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE35221F3DC;
	Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qku63 with SMTP id 63so124453885qku.3;
	Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=1KzKHplqvy3lbSrefZn7wU05nA8B+E13z52DLel6m70=;
	b=d0agEgD6sMvdO80IKokm23jtJvv7pXkUPk4nwqRTmLqJRp0TgPEp5dUHNTf16I8tY0
	bytvAAO98JlCFkWgrjeogYihQjrGjrtA201qbpfMozFTUclKZyDRk/8ldejk/8H6Bd2X
	OdowcMOIaAB5uFktsjLNumZh0yibHzdrdZrWj/7iZLznvx89paNR/+lvkPbzw6wVP6u8
	hmq7/W5Zmn9/efMj5t5XrcZPYU4mItcMGZKeCATory5HHlXhQ+Nkr+VGmU0BEpp25OMp
	S/EEbJUv0XpqTTjo222Frf5qetNkGJ1TCTl28Lsy0rB2f8oC28wFKRdrVgvsKuJil5lV
	1o7g==
X-Received: by 10.140.147.213 with SMTP id 204mr37618143qht.58.1429158303415; 
	Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from richs-mbp-11726.home.lan
	(pool-71-241-215-163.port.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.241.215.163])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 91sm4830685qgl.2.2015.04.15.21.25.02
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4ewK-ZEj0Fw14=Vwzk2xphiLZS4bdi95oJXLLPuRKPwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:25:01 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AE067EE3-0B24-4DB9-82E8-074169BDD976@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw4ewK-ZEj0Fw14=Vwzk2xphiLZS4bdi95oJXLLPuRKPwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 02:28:05 -0700
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	"codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [Codel] hard limit codel
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:25:33 -0000

Dave,

> I reserve comment until after the liquor wears off:
>=20
> http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2015/IMECS2015_pp615-619.pdf

Please don't fisk this. The paper is *way* too long to be worth a =
sentence-by-sentence refutation of every inaccuracy or outright =
wrong-headed understanding of Codel... :-)

Instead, rejoice in the SpaceX launch. Was it wonderful?

Rich

> --=20
> Dave T=E4ht
> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
>=20
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
> _______________________________________________
> Codel mailing list
> Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel