From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com (mail-lb0-x236.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::236])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D10A721F757
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbk10 with SMTP id k10so15260599lbb.0
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=ZPrJkQV+rnOruSzyk1KpJvTtRumpnKHMj7HrdT7lo5U=;
	b=vH4iZGi0nLsK9FfZ1SXlo3x3u/uhfkLjd1vrMpdQ6IV5t8N256K4360RvoEf5kSyfA
	fmb8/6ukxQVY7WWr0iKz/He0a8fXURsUZiMkSPysbOTa5AOI8JV6pqAeIWcOYN3SWqrm
	Fjp2I6KGmAK9ch0Xs6PhnWKhAhZ4KyJEGFHNdNSSR++6UVr0wVtGDxyxfne12fo2NIBR
	yi64Y27IWsMniFQeF/G+oFpp1xgcd5fVcxUy3HAZJj2ftfS1Co9eBcXS4bYNn61FDguE
	FNr68qAAOaUU+Rdw3/lW6WcWT3gjf7VEMfMkTMVJgQWnmtawwcjv9gA0G1VHtIEpl7of
	yJ9w==
X-Received: by 10.112.181.71 with SMTP id du7mr10978920lbc.37.1444607285740;
	Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (176-93-46-50.bb.dnainternet.fi.
	[176.93.46.50])
	by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm2412057lfb.11.2015.10.11.16.48.04
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5mL_68QBtAwXjhTwzgVGRMf+dWXOfdfs=qJvTiKjr2tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 02:47:59 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B15EFEF5-0871-42DD-BF24-396BF00ED699@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw5mL_68QBtAwXjhTwzgVGRMf+dWXOfdfs=qJvTiKjr2tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] start at interval handling
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 23:48:31 -0000


> On 12 Oct, 2015, at 00:30, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> so... anyway, this does start some api breakage, also. Anyone else got
> braincells?

Some of that is definitely wrong.  The rate_overhead parameter needs to =
be signed, for a start, since some last-mile encapsulations have *less* =
overhead than Ethernet.  That=E2=80=99s why I had it as =E2=80=98short=E2=80=
=99 instead of =E2=80=98u16=E2=80=99.

 - Jonathan Morton