From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16FA73B260 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:44:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id g62so34266584lfe.3 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:44:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ke0LmhYYLeH7w6OhYOtU3EsNYeO6X6GnrhktqNYmy9s=; b=bVjNse7dms7YSb1hqUsNBInnaNvJCjHC+7JpM7iuoKZ+GcWymgOcbZrcFeRd52+1z7 aNE/gnbuXti5Y6SeGGJPhg2aTg7a3S61Wiq3kpuJreD7ytsFIM6amobYviUa5tiFnYgU dTynr/6PO8gINb6sPEYOUQXWLcc6YhpDViNPZe7UbSSOEUw16K3LGQBoCXpLJWuD2Ncg Inpv793qOwxLmkBUSL2YG7ENOUzhKgxGt3WGbxCAPF8OHSBAJr2udyA+9++W17xEXaqQ bynFHc+eWr5Ti44pS0nQ2hlIlEC/4fwb9M7O/mXcsDxG+FSbgxAA2dBrSI0HbQX8DE+y tu1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ke0LmhYYLeH7w6OhYOtU3EsNYeO6X6GnrhktqNYmy9s=; b=XQ3Cnxx4+E0EPmR5XxUMdLXuwaoi3vpQfjT04W17TGdA55MUDD+/WghopWMZc58qAs Ca3rZh2kDUMhkvCkktbH6JaXfz0uYP/ZcZVdCJ4DWQqD1mNcjgk+UZey3beNwwX4s4Tp BWksGsWbZE6SwZmhhTILJbfonb27vVr5goXI4jqvmeOIL9MhzWT7mWdbU49VwLVmjZ9R w3QL235IU3tCV8seMcGD0vTkzeTX3zv2ZDqpozbdUq1lXoDqP0c3sek0nzuDB/oIhPJF lak2G9gvCuL0IvC0jJiPK1BnJJMCHxTynwmeC9zJO5qEC4dPKvNcMCdVQpcxrJg0FT4G lxMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkYFC+nsi1uNNvD1jpWu9ViRVoyBEMxmxoKLuyzN+ZJ3JQP4LAJXiMxvigOSg1f2A== X-Received: by 10.25.19.205 with SMTP id 74mr5596027lft.127.1475009047848; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.13] (37-33-90-35.bb.dnainternet.fi. [37.33.90.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x14sm690317lfa.4.2016.09.27.13.44.06 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: <25bd19bb-b5c7-fd68-62c9-b8e67590ab44@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:44:04 +0300 Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <3a99770e-6350-471f-72b6-b209d7d77d75@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <83b95479-c1f5-3589-912c-abe427805449@gmail.com> <43fa53d7-6180-09fe-9581-29d7dedba3d9@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> <25bd19bb-b5c7-fd68-62c9-b8e67590ab44@gmail.com> To: Noah Causin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Subject: Re: [Cake] de-natting & host fairness X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:44:09 -0000 > On 27 Sep, 2016, at 23:40, Noah Causin wrote: >=20 > The de-nat with dual-flow isolation works great. I tested it = simultaneously with two separate virtual machines, one running a Flent = 50 flows download test and the other running a Flent 8 flows download = test. Throughput was even between the machines, and the latency was = great. Awesome. Now, of course, I have work to do=E2=80=A6 - Jonathan Morton=