Cake - FQ_codel the next generation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Georgios Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com>
Cc: "Pete Heist" <pete@heistp.net>,
	"Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0@gmx.de>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cake" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] Upstream submission of dual-mode fairness patch
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 05:17:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B5E781D5-810F-4D32-B03D-EDBFA6E6CBC5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACvFP_jQH+eMEvrjqzZSbOU=HSFiYNvTGdhVbF43F6fKyAxoYg@mail.gmail.com>

> On 4 Mar, 2019, at 4:55 am, Georgios Amanakis <gamanakis@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> …the fairness logic wouldn't account for that "ingress traffic" and would yield fairer results.

Well there we have a quandary, since presently it enforces fairness of *load* on the bottleneck link, but the change would alter that to fairness of *delivered* traffic.  The current setup is arguably more robust against adversarial traffic, don't you think?

 - Jonathan Morton


  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-04  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.1788.1551352661.3538.cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2019-03-01 10:52 ` Pete Heist
2019-03-01 11:01   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-01 11:55     ` Pete Heist
2019-03-01 14:40       ` Georgios Amanakis
2019-03-01 16:43         ` Pete Heist
2019-03-02  3:02           ` George Amanakis
2019-03-02  4:47             ` George Amanakis
2019-03-02 10:20               ` Pete Heist
2019-03-03  7:19                 ` Pete Heist
2019-03-03  9:53                   ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-03  9:58                     ` Jonathan Morton
2019-03-03 11:26                       ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-03 12:13                         ` Jonathan Morton
2019-03-03 12:53                           ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-03 16:07                           ` Pete Heist
2019-03-03 16:10                             ` Jonathan Morton
2019-03-03 16:35                               ` Pete Heist
2019-03-03 16:40                                 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-03-03 18:48                                   ` Pete Heist
2019-03-03 19:03                                     ` gamanakis
2019-03-03 19:49                                       ` Pete Heist
2019-03-04  2:55                                         ` Georgios Amanakis
2019-03-04  3:17                                           ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2019-03-04  4:22                                             ` Ryan Mounce
2019-03-04  8:27                                               ` Pete Heist
2019-03-04 13:17                                                 ` Pete Heist
2019-03-04 14:36                                                   ` Georgios Amanakis
2019-03-03 12:06                   ` Pete Heist

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=B5E781D5-810F-4D32-B03D-EDBFA6E6CBC5@gmail.com \
    --to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=gamanakis@gmail.com \
    --cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
    --cc=pete@heistp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox