From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A0543B29E for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 04:36:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id k61so17017844wrc.4 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 01:36:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=uT9RNeltI9L95BcJO1H0PLZpJnUQ6EH5OifOU0+jDjg=; b=O6qHVydvlrws5jOn/prLPCvnkiRgQriKXYZVe4Ww7EhjPnmHwij0GCclY23DxAfVGH yLNu7qxerMaXkLKhQ+6Gce5td+DwXyyZfBHaoYZpuIXY6GNAKGFCFhOIL+CCls/TlKZz EygLZZQkd8W4DBcCHE2GHCSsc0V4aTyEuVhKUE1L1nnLI9sRgywYXDNky9auhOHk31Js o3XvRNmMbRRkXAompKUo998S4GcMpiLM6K/ti7E6PhAycd1BT/kNkGwcejZBd+np3/Nf c/XU+2L3WdkGZnUF0cnZhcwzECu/SzEcbkydAXIdhJLsuda6oIg9prlcd/pQRwGPLP5R Ma7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=uT9RNeltI9L95BcJO1H0PLZpJnUQ6EH5OifOU0+jDjg=; b=G3Ai/lgcW12XG1DQy/+B9iQUJb1qDPtlEL4w5k315/xxw1iO4BNdeVLZdlKve4HXTu H4YesFKZT0qR4XODKTsv66wNfdb6T3gqW68YkYuNw/Iq5mAJkcU4530KIxLvvDi/G9uM X6hQDPprV6i+Fbx4h4XICONXXUZTWNUDJd0XebKUpkD4FjPWrI70rnjeVsjgd+A5+FBF dYppWY/kmsz8OndWjcdO2o/OYJnY20KLCymbJQELM+iPiz5AT/BGVp3pgQ2vwRzJq1KE ogdon1SHOtYjOKJHTlb1ms2/k9BEaYohdcbV+DGInfltbtelLs86Yn6Ds6Qi54TxoBEu Uhrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX49Z5rcvBagP82THUQD6U3hcwSxfIpNK1j/dnVgv4uoNh6kYyzN mx+DLYnORANn2k/gfJKLgZ0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbwocWq+FeN89bGspKz9al02SYFVzq+UJg2VCIGONj3I1A3ERkSHIdQ7S7TqvLGoEBQikYkMA== X-Received: by 10.223.134.185 with SMTP id 54mr18986175wrx.128.1511429792170; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 01:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.72.0.130] (h-1169.lbcfree.net. [185.99.119.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x17sm7109269wrd.48.2017.11.23.01.36.31 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Nov 2017 01:36:31 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Pete Heist In-Reply-To: <65345DE4-8E75-4913-9FFF-2823BF70AB85@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:36:30 +0100 Cc: Cake List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <107CB879-B196-40F1-A7C2-08B963B7A835@gmail.com> <65345DE4-8E75-4913-9FFF-2823BF70AB85@gmail.com> To: Sebastian Moeller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Subject: Re: [Cake] small cake_hash optimization? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:36:33 -0000 > On Nov 23, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Pete Heist wrote: >=20 > Thanks for the overhead info. I used that in my latest tests. That = makes me wonder if those overheads could be defaulted when Cake knows = Ethernet is being used with rate limiting? I know a goal is to make cake = easier to configure so such things are examples of what people are = likely to miss. BTW I realize there=E2=80=99s no way cake can know what the overheads = should actually be, just to make sure the defaults are sensible I guess. = I know overheads are not an easy thing.=