From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: "Dave Täht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>, Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] fq_codel_fast
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 20:42:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C1DBECA6-BF84-405A-9CAA-F2C9BC410ECF@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4fV36S+Aa21soQL7RgtMGUTN=XhnQ97ifZ8rpRe=hHuw@mail.gmail.com>
That means that the conntrack numbers give an upper bound, no?
Best Regards
Sebastian
> On Sep 6, 2018, at 20:40, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> re: conntrack - I think the udp standard for holding a hole punch open
> is 2-3 minutes. I've
> seen 30 sec or less in the field.
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:36 AM Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2018, at 7:22 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> There was a very good paper or two (I think luca co-authored one) that
>>> showed that "active flows" were generally measured in the mid 200s in
>>> nearly any scenario. I agreed with that which was in part why I felt
>>> we could stick
>>> with 1024 queues, a direct mapped hash, and a couple collisions.
>>
>> So I’m not sure if this is a great way to gauge active flow counts through a router, but at 8pm:
>>
>> root@FreeNetVysina:~# grep ESTABLISHED /proc/net/ip_conntrack | wc -l
>> 446
>> FreeNetJerab:~# grep ESTABLISHED /proc/net/ip_conntrack | wc -l
>> 181
>> FreeNetOldrichova:~# grep ESTABLISHED /proc/net/ip_conntrack | wc -l
>> 228
>>
>> Far from my estimate of tens. Many of those can be idle connections, I suspect. 60-80% of them are http/s.
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Dave Täht
> CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> http://www.teklibre.com
> Tel: 1-669-226-2619
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-06 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 1:04 Dave Taht
2018-08-29 8:12 ` Pete Heist
2018-08-29 14:23 ` Dave Taht
2018-08-30 18:24 ` Dave Taht
2018-09-06 17:10 ` Pete Heist
2018-09-06 17:22 ` Dave Taht
2018-09-06 17:25 ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-09-06 18:36 ` Pete Heist
2018-09-06 18:40 ` Dave Taht
2018-09-06 18:42 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2018-09-06 19:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C1DBECA6-BF84-405A-9CAA-F2C9BC410ECF@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=pete@heistp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox