From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [PATCH net-next] net_sched: sch_cake: Add drop reasons
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 11:10:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C2055FB9-8EA4-486D-9654-84ED422A4A0C@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a5d46i9c.fsf@toke.dk>
> On 10 Dec, 2024, at 10:42 am, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>>> On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 13:02:18 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>> Add three qdisc-specific drop reasons for sch_cake:
>>>>
>>>> 1) SKB_DROP_REASON_CAKE_CONGESTED
>>>> Whenever a packet is dropped by the CAKE AQM algorithm because
>>>> congestion is detected.
>>>>
>>>> 2) SKB_DROP_REASON_CAKE_FLOOD
>>>> Whenever a packet is dropped by the flood protection part of the
>>>> CAKE AQM algorithm (BLUE).
>>>>
>>>> 3) SKB_DROP_REASON_CAKE_OVERLIMIT
>>>> Whenever the total queue limit for a CAKE instance is exceeded and a
>>>> packet is dropped to make room.
>>>
>>> Eric's patch was adding fairly FQ-specific reasons, other than flood
>>> this seems like generic AQM stuff, no? From a very quick look the
>>> congestion looks like fairly standard AQM, overlimit is also typical
>>> for qdics?
>>
>> While I initially agreed with making this generic, preserving the qdisc from
>> where the drop came lets you safely inspect the cb block (timestamp, etc),
>> format of which varies by qdisc. You also get insight as to which
>> qdisc was dropping.
>>
>> Downside is we'll end up with SKB_DROP_REASON_XXX_OVERLIMIT for
>> each of the qdiscs. Etc.
>
> Yeah, I agree that a generic "dropped by AQM" reason will be too generic
> without knowing which qdisc dropped it. I guess any calls directly to
> kfree_skb_reason() from the qdisc will provide the calling function, but
> for qdisc_drop_reason() the drop will be deferred to __dev_queue_xmit(),
> so no way of knowing where the drop came from, AFAICT?
Would it make sense to be able to extract a "generic" code by applying a bitmask? Leave code space for "qdisc specific" reasons within that mask. Then people who don't care about qdisc internals can still reliably interpret the codes, even for future qdiscs.
- Jonathan Morton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-10 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 12:02 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-12-09 13:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-12-09 23:00 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2024-12-09 23:14 ` Dave Taht
2024-12-09 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-10 0:25 ` Dave Taht
2024-12-10 8:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-12-10 9:10 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2024-12-11 1:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-11 9:55 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C2055FB9-8EA4-486D-9654-84ED422A4A0C@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox