From: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] [net-next PATCH 00/14] lockless qdisc series
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:07:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C567C636-18E5-4B2F-AB94-B0AD5641BBE0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EFFF92-D177-4B11-888F-D50EBCFA5341@gmail.com>
> On Dec 7, 2017, at 10:57 PM, Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 7, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm forwarding this sort of stuff 'cause I keep hoping to find more
>> optimizations for cake, and it really seems like cheap multicores have
>> grown very common.
>
> Great, that sounds like it could be a real improvement. I’m thinking again of ER-Xs, which are weak quad-cores that can’t run cake at more than around 100Mbps aggregate bandwidth, and do better at significantly less.
>
> Speaking of those, Ubiquiti hasn’t responded yet but at least the new kernel request has more Kudos than a number of other requests that have already been accepted, for what that’s worth, and in case anyone hasn’t added their vote (https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/Upgrade-Linux-kernel-to-at-least-4-4/idi-p/2140663).
It’s looking like a >= 4.4 kernel will appear in EdgeOS 2.0, whenever that arrives…
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-13 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20171207173500.5771.41198.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
2017-12-07 18:53 ` [Cake] Fwd: " Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE22iXQsrwT3o0sv_=ydrk6wr6nqtoN3k5Tf1mxdzJC04A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE3ESNejMEPDJORtDtHZpTTQKROs3-e1xbejajrpciYD2A@mail.gmail.com>
2017-12-07 19:05 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-12-07 19:07 ` [Cake] " Dave Taht
2017-12-07 21:57 ` Pete Heist
2017-12-13 7:07 ` Pete Heist [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C567C636-18E5-4B2F-AB94-B0AD5641BBE0@gmail.com \
--to=peteheist@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox