From: Pete Heist <peteheist@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: "Dave Täht" <dave@taht.net>, "Cake List" <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cake] lan keyword affects host fairness
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:18:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C7B2276D-72EA-4BFB-A107-310BF4FB2D18@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE0rFBcpUu9K93A66OoTMeD+QB45fJu9oedNW1g2Y+pjog@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 994 bytes --]
> On Nov 24, 2017, at 9:32 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mmm, that's a lot of drops. So you're not using ECN?
>
Not using ecn. I did one ecn run but didn’t see much change. I did more runs at 950mbit- 20ms, 50ms 100ms and added a chart at the bottom of rtt vs fairness (same doc, link for reference):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SMXWw2fLfmBRU622urfdvA_Ujsuf_KQ4P3uyOH1skOM/edit#gid=2072687073 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SMXWw2fLfmBRU622urfdvA_Ujsuf_KQ4P3uyOH1skOM/edit#gid=2072687073>
There seems to be a weird asymmetry that happens sometimes at rtt 20ms and rtt 50ms. One run at 20ms (right after rebooting) looked good but an earlier one didn’t. Three runs at 50ms all showed some level of asymmetry.
I’ll have to move on to other work, but the results still show fairness working pretty well at 100ms. It sometimes works well at other rtts, but there are variations and sometimes asymmetries. It’s hard to pull apart.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1559 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-25 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-23 9:21 Pete Heist
2017-11-23 9:44 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-23 10:25 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-23 17:03 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-24 11:21 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-11-24 12:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-11-24 13:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-11-24 13:49 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-24 19:41 ` Pete Heist
2017-11-24 19:48 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-24 20:24 ` Pete Heist
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE2eX4AJCPaBL-FW7Oj_afthXKnZn1RHQPH1VBCJfCyXDg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-11-24 20:32 ` Jonathan Morton
2017-11-25 7:18 ` Pete Heist [this message]
2017-11-24 20:03 ` Dave Taht
2017-11-24 20:40 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cake.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C7B2276D-72EA-4BFB-A107-310BF4FB2D18@gmail.com \
--to=peteheist@gmail.com \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@taht.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox