From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44FA221F4FA
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon,  2 Nov 2015 17:39:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lfgh9 with SMTP id h9so2016870lfg.1
	for <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:39:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=HanQFHmPIbhX1vcDOHAKJpfN5IR8pvpGh2hKoOuViEU=;
	b=yu/XlS0Olo0AI4GTUQ/275iG69kI/S+K+tVgshFgGVWMH/UjvfNJLEecMDFtxt78jT
	oXRDDsY0n1vrVWTeGak4DG0Y+Dmy+eLfacTo+BAA1UKbfEoyStYOg2O/4l2+vQiaG1Rv
	qSn0dZE0IBWzIhpNO7DT0yBxIR4tiEpwUVjMGDkU0BuRUuFM6Ty24WsYHK3pl+k4p9xG
	NCol+RK6u2qdRlCawkUlTt5DJZjL8bDb4BOpJYIS6+fctSZIlmW0lIEC4WMQ5/1daGs8
	kdqebYIgYOz54KI/dlCjJMxpq0JgZbc0mtV/h0zvr5cpJoxTwBhhl9jz77CpeM2Jj4Dk
	4GlQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.209.71 with SMTP id mk7mr11836351lbc.46.1446514749770;
	Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (83-245-237-115-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi.
	[83.245.237.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
	p198sm4456813lfe.39.2015.11.02.17.39.08
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6A2609D9-7747-487B-9484-ECC69C50DE96@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 03:39:06 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CA077244-F5B4-4748-954B-9618BACAC90F@gmail.com>
References: <87pozspckj.fsf@toke.dk>
	<6A2609D9-7747-487B-9484-ECC69C50DE96@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cake] Long-RTT broken again
X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation <cake.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake>
List-Post: <mailto:cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake>,
	<mailto:cake-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 01:39:34 -0000


> On 2 Nov, 2015, at 20:29, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
>=20
> the initial commit was not as well tested as it should have been=85

Indeed, and the obvious problems with it were why I reverted it.  I was =
able to put in a partial implementation by other means at the same time, =
but haven=92t yet had time to polish off the rough edges.

The question remains why a 15MB buffer (which comfortably exceeds the =
traditional FIFO rule of thumb for 1 second * 100Mbps) is apparently =
insufficient according to Toke=92s tests, even with the target increased =
as requested.

 - Jonathan Morton