From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7008D3B29E for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 12:02:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id d17so3564725wmb.3 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 09:02:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uP+X6CLAR5ihOYgarlRBZFY24hDmrsh3/yfRunEcp8w=; b=Ci2K/NXzoPqliveAuprmX0xD47KVoGoJDuwabgKb7d8dNalwUfutwRNXleRxyGBvAR cvsNPgXsk7HEFGc9kg+GPt4bw/Iq0b7NTeFa87FAVyJKF7a1Q5QL3sLdpOA2t8cZj6r6 +9GQtJURSgv5NJ9F/oWVN1hECA+CWw3Yr4WZKxmiW6j2ACCV/cOrnJ0dkv/BmFiYMHGY Xkj9NtD4Hwl2O+cuc/3YNtQpBGRded/xOpaUj/4ZgsqncuVx5Dr2FegaWuvcRceYvnsK CyIHRc8C71lyycewNNv4Td+4voVHoccxrVDZZ74CrNC9/dthTluB9T4jMc9Efg8UkvzF sEgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uP+X6CLAR5ihOYgarlRBZFY24hDmrsh3/yfRunEcp8w=; b=YCG7SWapVVxdx9IumBaT+ZvRksGa9jGmuHxNuwBW8aHrDPaw3s6RugN57h6ygVtvge 3+D5QiUpDyOKUk1TTlUWxuCWJwlv4B8VOmkSQ1iqctD3mAA1tE/sHtw2AciktICv3xm/ /XbxbsNfzZkEi/6VcYk+VwCD+xCsoAIhjou5bBBKqXcnOZeveNc9+fk0a84NFNvvvn1y eVc6Zzuca/dmqnVWeElU2n/AtGp8IwS7F4lKaMEj3M87h42kQEtkIWvFsjYkNd+CcPZP a/7tVQPqXg/C9G1a280H600/LzqDP5bSt79ERkXBbgadK7GrF8I6/XcVolmDR/KFbJFw zwxg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVPRP/P7etpE2TJpDbJCZrADuBcqy206/uma5ivjplK7STES/2s trXCfEp312t1cUdnHXgFZNFcppg+EuvUML6LynI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzl/hfkNLgkDKnZ7veZXd+da650JltEI0Es4rD3jS8I20F7avQ8GNuRHlWyhLLks10dIwng4msymAIOXelTAaY= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:cb0c:: with SMTP id b12mr3432043wmg.86.1559059318980; Tue, 28 May 2019 09:01:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <875zpvvsar.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <875zpvvsar.fsf@toke.dk> From: Akshat Kakkar Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 21:31:45 +0530 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: netdev , lartc , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 May 2019 12:12:03 -0400 Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake not doing rate limiting in a way it is expected to do X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 16:02:00 -0000 It's a controlled lab setup. Users connected to eno2 and server on eno1. Link speed 1Gbps. No ingress shaping. Simple http download. I am having multiple rates requirement for multiple user groups, which I am controlling using various classes and thus using htb. Just to mention once again, fq_codel is working it's expected way.