From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97F663B2A4 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 07:42:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id d139so4330976wmd.0 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 04:42:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yTt5XdK0kAp6RZsjOuMjHlFFoxc/QKYaDuzmbXs0yDM=; b=T8+hHlkVeFkqMZJZUIJnAGzv4baxM6c6riELQ+FAiuro+7gYOrT3/CP7C+mUkbK2E5 4jFb8G/ttG2dHjQ26aS7I9XLhEFczIIxrGE0Nb2JM7x9xX0yomHn5cp/9k2iuA7+oMCa 5xO7hDAf8hIIuUMXj4xJkU9tJyQ4oFz4xt994/0KEV35Tko4MDZByX7Vi0zFtmRbv8eQ BVsVRw/wEjBOFI3x+CyMawOWKHHxAfjIWW02L5fWGYZBz3CAbUii8IBpK/jqi+ydengr HR/C9isfNrShYiu6TsOAO8O71Er5fU+mwYSsnZS/BIELuRjP5njbPdp4W5rsrzOKXvQe ojnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yTt5XdK0kAp6RZsjOuMjHlFFoxc/QKYaDuzmbXs0yDM=; b=HmFTVdwAHXilGAMYvKTGJYWnRFNPDPecpZAFqCUlBFsMhgApG5UgAgT1kfb+UcHfR9 FfN/VY1piQny3CMIfoKk+YJXs4uQkshYherqwzChG09zO45ee7aLGpni1jDSImZrb92d QGRnzMvI289+ZIHMJoQKxCdmP1FeKbfS4INK+s2jZMHuPfmkBx3He+k801Ze0rOU4Nf7 B2QF9kXOxcrgCCgqc3Yl4uQyPRtgkF5R8QHsNWT41O7lXvlbe3v/gqLx4wX5jbhuGNbw W2qOdPCBYAeJfKGA5OpbWB4yIWPNwAvtni9EPiGTeiQQ3VG8/RpoMpsLD7sPp5H+Kz9x Hhtg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUQVUn3lEdOFJQCDIOxrrIj6HVa0OczU2Nv0cjEnFuLgQwZ6dqA 7jlg1JpZpsuevE3dcMhcNqIYbqqjYy/MPBTP+Eo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx+++pfU65FjHfva/gsZ7cKLJZcYgmt6SyhpdnHe6T+mPRuEZSkZhGB3SsoCWazxszk2CyUyYvEjXjsLNN3HAI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:cd:: with SMTP id u13mr4192384wmm.24.1578660148813; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 04:42:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <875zpvvsar.fsf@toke.dk> <87muj6tusy.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <87muj6tusy.fsf@toke.dk> From: Akshat Kakkar Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 18:12:16 +0530 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: netdev , lartc , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] Cake not doing rate limiting in a way it is expected to do X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:42:29 -0000 Hi Toke, I will try to rebuild my setup and then get back to you. I was off due to an injury. Thanks, On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:50 PM Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > > Akshat Kakkar writes: > > > It's a controlled lab setup. Users connected to eno2 and server on eno1= . > > Link speed 1Gbps. > > No ingress shaping. > > Simple http download. > > > > I am having multiple rates requirement for multiple user groups, which > > I am controlling using various classes and thus using htb. > > Well, CAKE has its own built-in shaper, so it hasn't seen much testing > with HTB as a parent. Theoretically it *should* work, though, as long as > CAKE is running in unlimited mode. > > Could you please share your full config, and the output of `tc -s qdisc` > after a run? > > Thanks, > > -Toke