* [Cake] quantum configuration
@ 2020-07-21 15:32 Luca Muscariello
2020-07-21 22:29 ` Y
2020-07-24 12:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Luca Muscariello @ 2020-07-21 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cake List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 102 bytes --]
Is there a reason why in cake the quantum cannot be configured to a
different value like in fq_codel?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 186 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cake] quantum configuration
2020-07-21 15:32 [Cake] quantum configuration Luca Muscariello
@ 2020-07-21 22:29 ` Y
2020-07-24 12:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Y @ 2020-07-21 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cake
Hi.
tc -s qdisc show dev eth0
shows settled quantum.
On 2020/07/22 0:32, Luca Muscariello wrote:
> Is there a reason why in cake the quantum cannot be configured to a
> different value like in fq_codel?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cake] quantum configuration
2020-07-21 15:32 [Cake] quantum configuration Luca Muscariello
2020-07-21 22:29 ` Y
@ 2020-07-24 12:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-01-26 15:46 ` Dave Taht
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-07-24 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luca Muscariello, Cake List
Luca Muscariello <muscariello@ieee.org> writes:
> Is there a reason why in cake the quantum cannot be configured to a
> different value like in fq_codel?
I think this was mostly to be as no-knob as possible; so the quantum is
auto-scaled with the tin bandwidths, instead of being configurable.
Jonathan can probably expand on this...
-Toke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cake] quantum configuration
2020-07-24 12:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2021-01-26 15:46 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2021-01-26 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen; +Cc: Luca Muscariello, Cake List
I have kind of thought we could scale the quantum much higher as we
crack 200mbit to see if that helps on performance.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:26 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cake
<cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> Luca Muscariello <muscariello@ieee.org> writes:
>
> > Is there a reason why in cake the quantum cannot be configured to a
> > different value like in fq_codel?
>
> I think this was mostly to be as no-knob as possible; so the quantum is
> auto-scaled with the tin bandwidths, instead of being configurable.
>
> Jonathan can probably expand on this...
>
> -Toke
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
--
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-26 15:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-21 15:32 [Cake] quantum configuration Luca Muscariello
2020-07-21 22:29 ` Y
2020-07-24 12:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-01-26 15:46 ` Dave Taht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox