From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FA9E3B29D for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:47:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id h11so34336739ioh.11 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:47:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6LomKClCtEfnuD776XiT36a3aTTFH80m9hFnqOviSAw=; b=WLJq0zz+AGk1My7/3nbFiOSxgjvI1qmkZcGNLJIcpVoHV+vua9jXfBYGCnv220YF3u 12ADxVvkPwu5m0BC5PqGyxhDQ+S/NLCv3Ug2W3+EuIw40judGvJl7P0Yg1gC9/fOzTGQ A0fYvEFEwThlpCNKNF+G2zGVnlPpRlM7Nu2WlNyYZHI5dGwJn+4ar+q5KdB36LqGSl/6 3cs7ogFa7W4gwXEaXuJ1F1i6r4bu3xBtX3ShsyeWOlG6FUo4rsAEunVqwD6jdRQ5j0vR ZDMC+EJBjtvX3nlLVwahyq+4vFskTKYtQzGK+vngrufkSp6f7Ypm5f7aVcgG+6tghOOP z73A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6LomKClCtEfnuD776XiT36a3aTTFH80m9hFnqOviSAw=; b=QyinpZiNdRmnmZZwL+OrbkG/Hkgra3bmZPzLiRazgmCS5/diNU+kAShPTc12eqSdRq eNKhZ0Scr1a/XkwSDO0aLCFBbdC/aboE8HP1W9RBINP042Uyr/Wmmv/7+yXC0qrF9YIf kNXWKLfh+CTvDxZoVE+wAS5jY9ZdxIrGt81NsHXAxMIDHxyKxTGynFXPxOV7j88vzEcr oRF5T6bXYtFrajFA4Rixh6pttQ7DLg2vH+KEyEH4k4JHC0nvxIjctNdRlHErGtAmijj6 VBnL2WBpkarkU3JbiieTB+mIQ7QTrHxdXXZ5SMjhWH0GWwrOUnQRjEy7g+S8VkiDboER 6F9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532t1hPDyti2SXm4qSw+CxKN1nGy3Mkxgt8wWbjnKYroFDHtUJbX sq7okofiJSRoOKzWo9Z91aQTBv02VFGwAPiFh0Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoOuchJHSkPnndLKGJQXXTPkfChOmTkX3AKa/Snd6gclibji6snWNQ3Xz3iupmhblzKgTskt3834ymDhiZLtQ= X-Received: by 2002:a02:63cd:: with SMTP id j196mr5252459jac.61.1611676027980; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:47:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87lfj95cbq.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <87lfj95cbq.fsf@toke.dk> From: Dave Taht Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:46:56 -0800 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: Luca Muscariello , Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] quantum configuration X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:47:08 -0000 I have kind of thought we could scale the quantum much higher as we crack 200mbit to see if that helps on performance. On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:26 AM Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen via Cake wrote: > > Luca Muscariello writes: > > > Is there a reason why in cake the quantum cannot be configured to a > > different value like in fq_codel? > > I think this was mostly to be as no-knob as possible; so the quantum is > auto-scaled with the tin bandwidths, instead of being configurable. > > Jonathan can probably expand on this... > > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake --=20 "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman dave@taht.net CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729