From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A59703B29E for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:38:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id a142so18026555qkb.5 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:38:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nAoi9MlBmBY8ea7uuaclhbzR4TLulNevxosSOPO0wvE=; b=ECWKhem7pf25CBi9M9s9umgiVGHF2bLhVxvvw3uI6/Upy0OOCI1vO6vC97jkDzk78B blIRNgwOg5lpSLzqcIY45Tsw2BHwkwJtYatAQcQ/9/j20HGMv4SfAhpvfv2Yt2L/+aWA BZES0shwKqHhmxRQlD6imfmvO7K/QQc3kU6CJISCY2aMJ0FM5HtRPcTlyATjK2i3PhLt lnOvOuIOaL53YznxOZRGA5SDLoPTqe9PJdBaX1C9OG/BrCio+oq/GA4j2o0l2pfymKqI M68VzzFZ8IRiM5+G2Qwb84bRSdMJkJ8ftI49WIERV5sejrSaIvaZXszqjhtB0xL3++3u +nxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nAoi9MlBmBY8ea7uuaclhbzR4TLulNevxosSOPO0wvE=; b=Iw9jEzTSkG3sEfmJs0zltXSngRg3od1h2sQhxPPJu4TFBjnNoNLHE7XxbzpO2GEk4x r1vXKihQ6liKhyBXHsI1idqkIwYZKsVuEOCidewTpotkm7RiR9mLr9/PkhojhLuBffOg CebBsTMtTJQZtcYDZRR1dQiHMcMxwELAwNf3vHv0LlWt6zmgVRQRDP6dJ9wFcEVFZrl/ AMuScJ9PPq73CUyE3xKUwbLr3OIHVbK52gTPqvUL8WxQu8QmBo5nDS8XUNvKrUwHp+yi 99fcfu1eN8MNpMwn8NFvSkAYAicgmZlNcVHGRDTfZbqdy7pdMH8wThCusIo+NxUg7Jz8 EbnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX74PrQNUmvy2WUXFQB2CZYvmURdQYbANQiArAOZ3Du1twluTEo3 CGvdsuvhHkkfXwHr9srElmZ+ulTd6gsz0CCHc44= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZqADpIq7dBv7B7rWCXestTXeQ65qKYdRSvJxL/KYdxkdQ2cAWy2NeaRCtoaSa0zk3wscyiMD2YXCzkv4rNRyA= X-Received: by 10.55.120.199 with SMTP id t190mr17519631qkc.63.1511375885310; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:38:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.193.93 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:38:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <107CB879-B196-40F1-A7C2-08B963B7A835@gmail.com> From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:38:04 -0800 Message-ID: To: Pete Heist Cc: Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Cake] small cake_hash optimization? X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 18:38:05 -0000 It is somewhat unfair to not include the pfifo bandwidth on the test (a cpu cost/byte might be a better metric), also pfifo_fast has three tiers of classification in it.