From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 656613CB35 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:01:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id f62-v6so3410536qke.2 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:01:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=epU6S7TYYlx0EUSGCNRsTZCovIocw2Gc9JYI1usZ/co=; b=bXkLcyY6DtIxKam0dr5Gx9C5y857B0II0CJEUQhJyhzeTFzfhxB2jvkqUkKswLa2pf jPL/F33p6vFM2JErozwum2/WgwyJMfwSQe+xM88CfsWIonQam0jR+xG82oc5dL9Cn2Zk b+kLhnepYHGPZ1WL189yS3ip05f3EBdEAVCealErLGMqPzheOeSSZ3t/UPeT9Snj64AJ JRSZ9zHQWOMXCcE7A19UJZ3RW9TuSNBcIbcxX0EGZQTgHw8wkKIk0pI5gBkphuRup2N8 thhxyDCrXUlSVJJgf/rdoaB15plMv83ctm8B+p291OXA2sXqAo/yv+cykqrnyEWTwJv4 BdIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=epU6S7TYYlx0EUSGCNRsTZCovIocw2Gc9JYI1usZ/co=; b=f1RfhvZGcPNGZHQ6I/RGPCNVmT9QfTa46WyMVx9BsLFhg8tyBGRFymTsuoV0rVrXBK f31QWdxEO2dbQ4T8YBwxOEShfRp5JcC4kKnvly4c7eXHiQNpvLXPZ7LyrLpK1HY1F2GZ ZuCzoPqElJE3cBDNJERJ7O52ok5B/B2X5FTtiGvPuBBJcQZNCwza15epTzjRCvBJRyX8 9YyaslGnCNVy6wO8+fRdziPcexGBUR17HVLPkXe9uN5Z4B6gQnI+EE0CYoBYVUfUtVlK Kerurr+54nDDqx+ddKO1bQndDpuavHA4xQj3T1Jm+TJ5bafW6h/tIAawFkQHKnkF+FdA 7fjg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DOH/0qqHZB67/TcNHmry0GsR1E5fIbiAIv9m31VtxL/cKdKrQM ZlIfLYfW7cZlzTYAHgJjDu+DnwrvKOoaj+ZLRTY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaYRu5gCs29MKfn2VVug+Sek06X1WEsEb7lkxy1trk6eXbsLZK+lGh4srCqNI33+WYewGMYqruMd6YsyCDiwWA= X-Received: by 2002:a37:6e82:: with SMTP id j124-v6mr2202627qkc.179.1537376494855; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:01:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1645d6fe-d5f2-4416-beed-ae5ac71170f8@email.android.com> <87va71kg1j.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: <87va71kg1j.fsf@toke.dk> From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:01:23 -0700 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: ruben@vfn-nrw.de, Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] Munin-Plugins X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:01:35 -0000 On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:11 AM Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > > Ruben writes: > > > Hey Toke, > > > > Am 13.09.2018 21:12 schrieb Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen : > > > > > > Ruben writes: > > > > > Hey Toke, > > > > > > Thanks for your fast response! > > > > > > Am 13.09.2018 12:27 schrieb Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen : > > > > > > > > > Ruben writes: > > > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > > > I've already mentioned this in a response to dtaht on GitHu= b, but > > here > > > > again for everyone: > > > > > > > > I was wondering if it's possible to extend the tin statisti= cs by > > > > packets for backlog. > > > > > > Why do you need packets when there's already bytes? > > > > > > Easy: dtaht requested a packets graph with ecn marks, which is al= so > > > packets, so backlog as bytes do not fit, backlog as packets do. > > > > > > The idea was to do a multi-graph which is one graph with combined > > > stats for all tins and sub graphs for all tins. > > > > > > On the main graph a backlog in packets is available, but I would = need > > > to leave out the backlog for the tins, which is somewhat confusin= g. > > > > Why not just do both backlogs in bytes? > > > > There's no counter for ecn marked packets in bytes, so it's impossible = to > > implement it that way, too. > > > > ECN-Marks is in packets, so everything else need to be in packets as > > well. > > Hmm, so the obvious follow-up question would be "why do you need to have > backlog and number of drops on the same graph?" :) A reasonable approximation of backlog in packets is achievable by dividing by 1000. > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619