From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC463ED58 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 07:29:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ob0-x233.google.com with SMTP id iw8so142996524obc.1 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 04:29:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=yqzFbsyZkvLRMOhsvQ3pK2+Ep3V9EyxA4vFqpcJGqO0=; b=ehAPXewF7v0eYALmWF4ET5G9XbvQ0i18fdI+/K6uAYREExDjWFuwEpkhvHJMKbT47/ pE9dnY33fMi09jp5LR1BUy35oaZakAOXJWkKvaEPvdklCSIrSMWWwY4YY1yhOailOw6I gJZnE2JbQdQLOZxR1wF5b9CRIW7YluZymfb/Bj0qx36Wet014rn+KWnYy21p22+gtfj4 QiNpicLTAARTtKY35QdTuAp6UlM0jgB/yEdow1u23vsQu5jgoEk2UkUN2D1tVbCFL/bq SPNkKu0iHme9vhYgHCOdzEScQhe+Yp9FLsTf0ud7SUKNpAqyZwFjs1LM/5hmXsERDZie yK4g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.176.166 with SMTP id cj6mr9939187oec.33.1450787370432; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 04:29:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.187.3 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 04:29:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:29:30 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Cake] cake dual hash for dualdst, dualsrc X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:29:31 -0000 It turns out that I actually proved something slightly different - cake's current codel implementation doesn't work worth a damn. Which I already "knew" from other test runs against other data sets. Toke's 2mbit/384k dataset arrived this morning, more or less making that obvious.