From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816F43B2A4 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:33:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f18-v6so2564852qtp.10 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:33:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7BhasFL5cGEj5nHFaQNtIrblskvy/pXNljgo6e/K0OE=; b=TeOo2LiM61RNiNg0qTvIE30jQ1RQE9mZpXyw+TdR+lxOo6G/HzulJ/uvpwixtU5obb rH/0lWusVj5kLQC78m0QHJ0HnMYCOAn604y6X9E/e/E+4qaONDRnnPk89ika53xAhgEE a1n0DE46EPyU54coVBrtucHwAgoG6ATPG7VC4YU8rGf6OeevBnOlFKTxK99AV+11KUnR qKq7anVa3kf5q/brlbKy6T6grUeUm3/0dxYtI6wgxUZ7pMkvimpiArMEEhL8NWNslOEB oah3wgKi17/0G6kVuKolIaCrAeLm5LMQVc29rxwqBoBif/z/HRGRZjX/+knyt5azqHGQ HsKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7BhasFL5cGEj5nHFaQNtIrblskvy/pXNljgo6e/K0OE=; b=F71Xv3MqyNJC5Vh0mjyKNM/oh+5TDGVTMwFr8oaWvGAJI9H31YEJ9IJI734KMxPu0e MG6+u/JSC5+hITGXWqcQ+RsSLgCrYznFV+mMO2BMEpUfWYSasn9QKfXQfVc3+37RhYsc 275Dp4LonIx0fU6y5JB3HsXVBoamjO47t5Vir6Wns/+/YNuxmP2cDFRcVdCSI+b3RO8X tdz7WBHtkn/5fNm3jjQycDh3/tndOl10xmyV/sPRVL+lZyHCN5dfY9sag0AWdFQoBRZf kMyIimWHYq8yeIKq7AKFeaTmxQ0SMchOyFDy2oD90GMAehETXCvQDgvqabsBT0qDVEeK wdHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlG9uHw3BLMp6kANsSPWXYchAX7FUbO7AluTrf3EQQqnkSp+WNB2 vfnbC+pCRQU0n5p/8L2QEYsFm7SfJZC3vlsSS24= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfF8v+a7NK34Q5y7Yk84gEebc+iGp8MXFVtM+tQpC4enwiLK/hH8U804ooTBUjUbOPJp2JFGv2YMZnqBkRiuh4= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9e5a:: with SMTP id z26-v6mr2775429qve.15.1532630020077; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:33:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:33:28 -0700 Message-ID: To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Cake List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cake] fq in p4 X-BeenThere: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Cake - FQ_codel the next generation List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:33:40 -0000 well, they got a working in-hardware prototype, and a p4 implementation, it uses DRR, shows feasability if nothing else. (they also report big wins throughout, and their aqm works against flow isolation). Happy. I asked them if they had any code we can play with. On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:17 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Typical academic paper testing with Reno. > At least they compared DCTCP > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 10:04 PM Dave Taht wrote: >> >> https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~arvind/papers/afq.pdf >> >> -- >> >> Dave T=C3=A4ht >> CEO, TekLibre, LLC >> http://www.teklibre.com >> Tel: 1-669-226-2619 >> _______________________________________________ >> Cake mailing list >> Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619